Impacts of male chromosomal polymorphisms on semen quality and IVF/ICSI outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

Yongjie Lu,Tian Tian,Lixue Chen,Liying Yan,Liang Chang,Jie Qiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15487
2024-04-06
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Abstract:Objective The study aims to elucidate the impacts of different types of male chromosomal polymorphisms (MCPs) on various outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 1442 couples with normal karyotypes, 1442 couples with MCPs, 42 couples with male chromosomal rearrangements (MCRs), and 42 couples with MCRs combined with MCPs who underwent IVF/ICSI treatment at Peking University Third Hospital from 2015 to 2021. The semen quality, embryological outcomes, and clinical outcomes of different groups stratified by karyotypes were compared. Results For couples undergoing IVF, male inv(9) was associated with a significantly lower sperm viability rate (29.41% vs 34.49%, P = 0.030), a lower progressive motility rate (25.13% vs 30.50%, P = 0.013), and a lower normal fertilization rate (52.41% vs 59.84%, P = 0.014). Male 9qh + was related to a lower sperm viability rate (27.56% vs 34.49%, P = 0.028). No MCPs were observed to compromise clinical outcomes in couples undergoing IVF. For couples undergoing ICSI, no MCPs exhibited an association with poorer semen quality and embryological outcomes. However, Yqh + and DGpstk+ were found to be significantly correlated with an increased likelihood of preterm birth (23.3% vs 9.2%, P = 0.003; 20.0% vs 9.2%, P = 0.041, respectively). In couples with MCRs, the presence of MCPs significantly reduced the sperm viability rate (19.99% vs 30.97%, P = 0.017) and progressive motility rate (8.07% vs 27.85%, P = 0.018). Conclusion Our study provides detailed evidence for the impacts of various MCPs on IVF/ICSI outcomes, reveals the complexity and heterogeneity of these impacts, and highlights the adverse effects of male inv(9).
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?