Abstract:Background: Bullying is a serious and growing problem affecting a significant proportion of healthcare professionals, a professional category exposed to work-related stress. Workplace bullying has been defined as a set of negative behaviours consisting in harassment, offense or negative influence on work that are directed to the members of the organization and that occur regularly and repeatedly over a period, becoming part of the context of work. Study design: We performed a cross-sectional study using the HSE questionnaire and defining the sample size considering the number of healthcare workers of a big hospital and then calculating it with EpiInfo™ software. 191 people have been enrolled. Methods: The study was divided into three steps. The first one to identify, among the workers, those who were exposed to bullying at work and those who were not. The second one has been aimed at assessing the presence of work-related stress through the administration of the HSE questionnaire. The third step has been aimed at performing the statistical analysis of the data. For each single domain explored by the questionnaire the score obtained was treated as a linear variable and the median and interquartile range (IQR) was calculated. After, a non-parametric analysis (Wilcoxon rank-sum test) was performed in order to define the statistical significance of the observed differences. Results: All the 191 questionnaires were self-administered by the Health Care Workers under study and correctly filled in without any multiple or missing responses. Considering the scores obtained to question n. 21, that investigates "bullying at work", we obtained two groups: High-Exposure Group (total, males and females), and Low-Exposure Group (total, males and females). In the High-Exposure Group, two critical domains were found: Demands and Control (total, male and female samples). The differences with the Low-Exposure Group were statistically significant. In the Low-Exposure Group the critical domain was Manager Support (total and female samples). The differences with the High Exposure Group were not statistically significant. Conclusion: This study aimed to show how the exposure to bullying can influence the perception of psychosocial risks. It seems that the workers most exposed to bullying also have worse scores on the HSE questionnaire, particularly for two domains: Demands and Control. That is consistent with the most recent scientific literature.

The Indirect Role of Support from Supervisors

How tyrannical leadership relates to workplace bullying and turnover intention over time: The role of coworker support

The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment Between Workplace Bullying and Turnover Intention Among Clinical Nurses in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

Bystander Helping Behavior in Response to Workplace Bullying

[Association of psychological violence, harassment, and cyberbullying with depression and turnover intentions in female nurses]

Why does workplace bullying affect victims’ job strain? Perceived organization support and emotional dissonance as resource depletion mechanisms

Job satisfaction and public service motivation in Australian nurses: the effects of abusive supervision and workplace bullying

Abusive Supervision Mediates Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: the Moderating Role of Outcome Dependence

Impact of bullying on work motivation and job satisfaction

Workplace Bullying Seen from the Perspective of Bystanders: Effects on Engagement and Burnout, Mediating Role of Positive and Negative Affects

Unravelling the mechanism between despotic leadership and psychological distress: the roles of bullying behavior and hostile attribution bias

Perceived career opportunities, commitment to the supervisor, social isolation: Their effects on nurses' well-being and turnover

Bullying behavior and employee well-being: how do different forms of social support buffer against depression, anxiety and exhaustion?

Bullying at work and work-related stress in healthcare workers: a cross sectional study

Bearing the Brunt: a Daily Diary Examination of Abusive Supervision and the Sustaining Role of Coworkers’ Support

Does bystander behavior make a difference? How passive and active bystanders in the group moderate the effects of bullying exposure.

Job Demand, Job Control, and Impaired Mental Health in the Experience of Workplace Bullying Behavior: A Two-Wave Study

Bullying bystander reactions: a case study in the Taiwanese workplace

The reverse buffering effect of workplace attachment style on the relationship between workplace bullying and work engagement

Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: The roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor's organizational embodiment.