Abstract:As the clean water shortage becomes a serious problem for mankind, atmospheric water harvesting has emerged as a viable solution. Two main approaches to collect water from the atmosphere exist: the first is to capture it from fog, whereas the second is through condensation of vapor on surfaces with a temperature below the dew point. The water collection mechanism in these two modes is completely different. In this work, we develop a deeper understanding of the effect of surface wettability on gravity-assisted atmospheric water harvesting and a comparative study of the two collection modes (fog and dew). First, we present theoretical estimates for the maximum water mass available in each mode and introduce an efficiency factor η which enables the direct comparison among surfaces in different setups and modes. Then we fabricate a series of micronanostructured surfaces with different surface wetting properties from hydrophilic to superhydrophobic. Our results demonstrate that drop mobility, derived from the surface superhydrophobic properties and micronanotopography, is the most important factor affecting fog collection: superhydrophobic surfaces show 40–65% higher fog collection rates compared to flat hydrophilic surfaces, with the more mobile among superhydrophobic surfaces (hysteresis 2°, and air–liquid fraction fA-L > 0.9) showing higher water collection. On the other hand, dew harvesting efficiency depends on the combination of drop mobility and nucleation rate, with superhydrophobic surfaces exhibiting 40% higher water collection rate compared to the flat hydrophilic or hydrophobic surfaces due to their low hysteresis as well as high surface area available for nucleation.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c16609.Experimental set up description. SEM images of surface topography before and after coating deposition. Experimental calculation of Aeff. Heat transfer coefficient calculation for natural and forced convection. Fog collection efficiency factor calculation as a function of fog air carrier gas flow (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Fog harvesting efficiency analysis of biomimicking surfaces: A review

Efficient Water Collection on Integrative Bioinspired Surfaces with Star-Shaped Wettability Patterns

Bio-inspired Fog Harvesting Materials: Basic Research and Bionic Potential Applications

Bionic Surfaces for Fog Collection: A Comprehensive Review of Natural Organisms and Bioinspired Strategies.

Multi‐Dimensional Bionic Micro‐Nanostructure Surface for Controllable Fog Harvesting: from Fabrication to Application

Biomimetic 3D efficient fog harvester by synergistic wettability effect

Active Surface Area-Dependent Water Harvesting of Desert Beetle-Inspired Hybrid Wetting Surfaces

Bio‐Inspired Wettability Integrated System for Environmentally Adaptable Fog Harvesting

Sprayed Hieratical Biomimetic Superhydrophilic-Superhydrophobic Surface for E Fficient Fog Harvesting

Biomimetic Leaf-Shaped Wedge Structure with Mixed Wettability for Fog Harvesting

Special Wettability Materials Inspired by Multiorganisms for Fog Collection

Patterned Hybrid Wettability Surfaces for Fog Harvesting

A Facile Strategy For The Fabrication Of A Bioinspired Hydrophilic-Superhydrophobic Patterned Surface For Highly Efficient Fog-Harvesting

A quadruple biomimetic hydrophilic/hydrophobic Janus composite material integrating Cu(OH) 2 micro-needles and embedded bead-on-string nanofiber membrane for efficient fog harvesting

Droplet morphology-based wettability tuning and design of fog harvesting mesh to minimize mesh-clogging

Acoustic Tweezer-Modulated Biomimetic Patterned Particle-Polymer Composite for Water Vapor Harvesting.

Biomimetic Fog Collector with Hybrid and Gradient Wettabilities

Recent advances in biomimetic fog harvesting: focusing on higher efficiency and large-scale fabrication

A comprehensive review of environment-friendly biomimetic bionic superhydrophobic surfaces

How Different Are Fog Collection and Dew Water Harvesting on Surfaces with Different Wetting Behaviors?

Biomimetic Superhydrophobic Triboelectric Surface Prepared by Interfacial Self‐Assembly for Water Harvesting