Abstract:Generative AI (GenAI) is a disruptive technology likely to generate a major impact on faculty and learners in medical education. This work aims to measure the perception of GenAI among medical educators and to gain insights into its major advantages and concerns in medical education. A survey invitation was distributed to medical education faculty of colleges of allopathic and osteopathic medicine within a single university during the fall of 2023. The survey comprised 12 items, among those assessing the role of GenAI for students and educators, the need to modify teaching approaches, GenAI's perceived advantages, applications of GenAI in the educational context, and the concerns, challenges, and trustworthiness associated with GenAI. Responses were obtained from 48 faculty. They showed a positive attitude toward GenAI and disagreed on GenAI having a very negative effect on either the students' or faculty's educational experience. Eighty-five percent of our medical schools' faculty responded to had heard about GenAI, while 42% had not used it at all. Generating text (33%), automating repetitive tasks (19%), and creating multimedia content (17%) were some of the common utilizations of GenAI by school faculty. The majority agreed that GenAI is likely to change its role as an educator. A perceived advantage of GenAI in conducting more effective background research was reported by 54% of faculty. The greatest perceived strengths of GenAI were the ability to conduct more efficient research, task automation, and increased content accessibility. The faculty's major concerns were cheating in home assignments in assessment (97%), tendency for blunder and false information (95%), lack of context (86%), and removal of human interaction in important feedback processes (83%). The majority of the faculty agrees on the lack of guidelines for safe use of GenAI from both a governmental and an institutional policy. The main perceived challenges were cheating, the tendency of GenAI to make errors, and privacy concerns.The faculty recognized the potential impact of GenAI in medical education. Careful deliberation of the pros and cons of GenAI is needed for its effective integration into medical education. There is general agreement that plagiarism and lack of regulations are two major areas of concern. Consensus-based guidelines at the institutional and/or national level need to start to be implemented to govern the appropriate use of GenAI while maintaining ethics and transparency. Faculty responses reflect an optimistic and favorable outlook on GenAI's impact on student learning.

Investigating instructors’ and students’ perceived knowledge and attitudes in using generative AI tools for teaching and learning

Understanding Student and Academic Staff Perceptions of AI Use in Assessment and Feedback

Misconceptions, Pragmatism, and Value Tensions: Evaluating Students' Understanding and Perception of Generative AI for Education

Students' Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education

Exploring generative AI literacy in higher education: student adoption, interaction, evaluation and ethical perceptions

The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?

Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative AI Tools for Programming Across Different Computing Courses

Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors

Exploring the integration and utilisation of generative AI in formative e-assessments: A case study in higher education

Generative AI and College Students: Use and Perceptions

Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of student's perceptions in the use of generative AI in educational environments

Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities' Policies, Resources, and Guidelines

Generative AI as a Learning Buddy and Teaching Assistant: Pre-service Teachers' Uses and Attitudes

Decoding medical educators' perceptions on generative artificial intelligence in medical education

University Teachers’ Views on the Adoption and Integration of Generative AI Tools for Student Assessment in Higher Education

Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives

Generative or Degenerative?! Implications of AI Tools in Pre-Service Teacher Education and Reflections on Instructors’ Professional Development

Evaluating the impact of students' generative AI use in educational contexts

Analysis of Professors’ Experiences with Generative AI and the Concerns of Classroom Use : Application of the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)