Compensatory changes after spinal cord injury in a remyelination deficient mouse model

S. B. Manesh,B. R. Kondiles,S. Wheeler,J. Liu,L. Zhang,C. Chernoff,G. J. Duncan,M. S. Ramer,W. Tetzlaff
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.16220
2024-09-15
Journal of Neurochemistry
Abstract:Previous work showed that 3‐month‐old remyelination deficient mice (Myrf ICKOs) regain locomotor function comparably to remyelination competent (Myrf‐Intact) controls after spinal cord injury. This study investigated the mechanisms by which mice compensate for remyelination failure after injury. Spared axons through the lesions of Myrf ICKOs conduct action potentials at comparable velocities to controls. The Myrf ICKOs exhibit subtle differences in gait cycle, without deficits, implying compensatory mechanisms cause subtle locomotor effects. A novel ion channel expression pattern of long sections of Nav1.2 colocalized with Kv1.2 channels was only observed in the Myrf ICKO. These data demonstrate potential compensatory mechanisms for demyelination and may have implications for future therapeutic interventions for spinal cord injury. The development of therapeutic strategies to reduce impairments following spinal cord injury (SCI) motivates an active area of research, because there are no effective therapies. One strategy is to address injury‐induced demyelination of spared axons by promoting endogenous or exogenous remyelination. However, previously, we showed that new myelin was not necessary to regain hindlimb stepping following moderate thoracic spinal cord contusion in 3‐month‐old mice. The present analysis investigated two potential mechanisms by which animals can re‐establish locomotion in the absence of remyelination: compensation through intact white matter and conduction through spared axons. We induced a severe contusion injury to reduce the spared white matter rim in the remyelination deficient model, with no differences in recovery between remyelination deficient animals and injured littermate controls. We investigated the nodal properties of the axons at the lesion and found that in the remyelination deficient model, axons express the Nav1.2 voltage‐gated sodium channel, a sub‐type not typically expressed at mature nodes of Ranvier. In a moderate contusion injury, conduction velocities through the lesions of remyelination deficient animals were similar to those in animals with the capacity to remyelinate after injury. Detailed gait analysis and kinematics reveal subtle differences between remyelination deficient animals and remyelination competent controls, but no worse deficits. It is possible that upregulation of Nav1.2 channels may contribute to establishing conduction through the lesion. This conduction could contribute to compensation and regained motor function in mouse models of SCI. Such compensatory mechanism may have implications for interpreting efficacy results for remyelinating interventions in mice and the development of therapies for improving recovery following SCI.
biochemistry & molecular biology,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?