Abstract:Background: Graft placement is a modifiable and often discussed surgical factor in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). However, the sensitivity of functional knee mechanics to variability in graft placement is not well understood. Purpose: To (1) investigate the relationship of ACL graft tunnel location and graft angle with tibiofemoral kinematics in patients with ACLR, (2) compare experimentally measured relationships with those observed with a computational model to assess the predictive capabilities of the model, and (3) use the computational model to determine the effect of varying ACL graft tunnel placement on tibiofemoral joint mechanics during walking. Study design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen participants who had undergone ACLR were tested. Bilateral ACL footprint location and graft angle were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Bilateral knee laxity was assessed at the completion of rehabilitation. Dynamic MRI was used to measure tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact during active knee flexion-extension. Additionally, a total of 500 virtual ACLR models were created from a nominal computational knee model by varying ACL footprint locations, graft stiffness, and initial tension. Laxity tests, active knee extension, and walking were simulated with each virtual ACLR model. Linear regressions were performed between internal knee mechanics and ACL graft tunnel locations and angles for the patients with ACLR and the virtual ACLR models. Results: Static and dynamic MRI revealed that a more vertical graft in the sagittal plane was significantly related (P < .05) to a greater laxity compliance index (R2 = 0.40) and greater anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation during active knee extension (R2 = 0.22 and 0.23, respectively). Similarly, knee extension simulations with the virtual ACLR models revealed that a more vertical graft led to greater laxity compliance index, anterior translation, and internal rotation (R2 = 0.56, 0.26, and 0.13). These effects extended to simulations of walking, with a more vertical ACL graft inducing greater anterior tibial translation, ACL loading, and posterior migration of contact on the tibial plateaus. Conclusion: This study provides clinical evidence from patients who underwent ACLR and from complementary modeling that functional postoperative knee mechanics are sensitive to graft tunnel locations and graft angle. Of the factors studied, the sagittal angle of the ACL was particularly influential on knee mechanics. Clinical relevance: Early-onset osteoarthritis from altered cartilage loading after ACLR is common. This study shows that postoperative cartilage loading is sensitive to graft angle. Therefore, variability in graft tunnel placement resulting in small deviations from the anatomic ACL angle might contribute to the elevated risk of osteoarthritis after ACLR.

ACL graft position affects in situ graft force following ACL reconstruction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Tunnel Placement and Graft Angle Are Primary Determinants of Internal Knee Mechanics After Reconstructive Surgery

Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement

Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee

Differences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Between the Surgical Side and Healthy Side of Knee Joint after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

An in Vivo Prediction of Anisometry and Strain in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Combined Magnetic Resonance and Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging Analysis.

Biomechanical comparison of different graft positions for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

ACL graft with extra-cortical fixation rotates around the femoral tunnel aperture during knee flexion

Customize the Position of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging and CT-based Finite Element Modelling to Estimate Forces and Stresses of Grafts in Anatomical Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction with Different Femoral Tunnels.

A Prospective Evaluation of Femoral Tunnel Placement for Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Preoperative Excessive Lateral Anterior Tibial Subluxation is Related to Posterior Tibial Tunnel Insertion with Worse Sagittal Alignment after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

Comparison of bilateral ligaments after unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Based on magnetic resonance imaging analysis

Effect of tunnel position for anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics in a porcine model

[Finite Element Analysis of the Graft Stresses after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction].

The 45° and 60° of Sagittal Femoral Tunnel Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provide Similar Knee Stability

In vivo graft tension in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during active leg-raising motion with the knee splinted

ACL mismatch reconstructions: influence of different tunnel placement strategies in single-bundle ACL reconstructions on the knee kinematics

Imaging Features of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Insufficiency

Correlation Analysis of Potential Factors Influencing Graft Maturity after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Medial Meniscal Posterior Horn Suturing Influences Tibial Internal-External Rotation in ACL-Reconstructed Knees