Abstract:Background After tooth loss, alveolar bone atrophy and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus occur. It is difficult for implant placement to posterior maxilla because of the reduced residual bone height (RBH) available. Osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) is a reliable technique and produced satisfied results. Compared with oral panoramic radiograph (OPG), the application of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) that provides clinically valuable information is considered to be more accurate assessment. Aim/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to compare radiographically the variances of measurements on OPG and CBCT, and to evaluate the effects of endo-sinus new bone formation after OSFE without grafting in a short time. Simultaneously, to analysis the potential related factors of endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG). Material and Methods A prospective study design was adopted. 87 implant placements were inserted in 80 patients. OPG and CBCT were used at preoperative, immediately in postoperative period and before stage II surgery (mean 5-month postoperative). The RBH was measured at preoperative and before stage II surgery, the implant protrusion length (IPL) was assessed at immediately postoperative and before stage II surgery, ESBG was reviewed before stage II surgery. Compare the RBH, IPL, ESBG between two groups from OPG and CBCT. Correlation analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between ESBG with IPL, RBH, age, gender and bone block lifted intraoperatively by osteotomes. Significance was set to 0.05. Results The mean RBH was 8.47 ± 1.78 mm on OPG and 8.08 ± 1.47 mm on CBCT preoperatively. After mean 5 months, it was found the averaged RBH was 9.58 ± 1.67 mm on OPG and 10.59 ± 1.51 mm on CBCT. The mean IPL was 2.44 ± 1.16 mm on OPG and 1.98 ± 1.09 mm on CBCT at immediately postoperative. The averaged IPL was 1.27 ± 1.30 mm on OPG and 0.05 ± 1.33 mm on CBCT before the stage II surgery, respectively. ESBG was 1.10 ± 0.76 mm on OPG and 1.90 ± 1.38 mm on CBCT. And there were all significant differences between two groups (P < 0.05). As shown by the numerical value, ESBG with bone block lifted were more than with no bone block lifted, but P value > 0.05 that indicating the difference was again not statistically significant difference between two groups. The relevant factors analysis detected that the final ESBG was positively correlated to IPL at immediately postoperative. Meanwhile, no other variables were detected showed to be associated with the final ESBG, including RBH, age, gender and bone block lifted. Conclusion and Clinical Implications In conclusion, compared with the OPG of 2D image, the errors of measurement could be reduced and the results could be assessed more accurately on CBCT. Approximate 2 mm endo-sinus bone augment could be acquired, and the final ESBG was explored to be positively correlated to IPL measured at immediately postoperative. Bone block lifted intraoperatively by osteotomes does not increase the amount of endo-sinus bone formation.

Quantitative analysis of change in bone volume 5 years after sinus floor elevation using plate-shaped bone substitutes: a prospective observational study

Bone Volume and Height Changes for Lateral Window Sinus Floor Elevation Using Two Types of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 1-4 Years

Comparative Evaluation of Endo-sinus Bone Augmentation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Grafting Using Two Radiographic Methods.

Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Placement Without Grafting by Two Radiographic Methods

Changes in Bone Graft Height and Influencing Factors after Sinus Floor Augmentation by Using the Lateral Window Approach: A Clinical Retrospective Study of 1 to 2 Years.

Volume change after maxillary sinus floor elevation with apatite carbonate and octacalcium phosphate

Radiographic Assessment of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) and Collagen-Stabilized DBBM for Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation: A 2-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Gene expression, micro‐CT and histomorphometrical analysis of sinus floor augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Evaluation of Two Beta-Tricalcium Phosphates with Different Particle Dimensions in Human Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

3D Cone Beam Radiodensitometry in Evaluation of Hydroxyapatite (HAP)/Tissue Hybrid after Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

Biphasic hydroxyapatite and ß‐tricalcium phosphate biomaterial behavior in a case series of maxillary sinus augmentation in humans

Monetite-based composite cranial implants demonstrate long-term clinical volumetric balance by concomitant bone formation and degradation

Microcomputed tomographic and histologic analysis of anorganic bone matrix coupled with cell-binding peptide suspended in sodium hyaluronate carrier after sinus augmentation: a clinical study

Long-Term Volumetric Stability of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using a Xenograft Bone Substitute and Its Combination with Autologous Bone: A 6+ Year Retrospective Follow-Up Study Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Radiographic graft changes following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone compared with composite grafts: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial

Clinical and radiographic changes following transcrestal sinus augmentation: A scoping review of the last 25 years

Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation

Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Changes after Sinus Floor Augmentation with DBBM

Assessment of the osteogenic effect after maxillary sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implantation with or without bone grafts by analyzing trabecular bone parameters: a retrospective study

Effects of Choukroun’s Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Bone Regeneration in Combination with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Histological and Histomorphometric Study

The Influence of Residual Alveolar Bone Height on Graft Composition after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Xenografts: A Histomorphometric Comparative Study