Comparing the Mixed Logit Estimates and True Parameters under Informative and Uninformative Heterogeneity: A Simulated Discrete Choice Experiment

Maksat Jumamyradov,Benjamin M. Craig,William H. Greene,Murat Munkin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10637-x
IF: 1.741
2024-07-14
Computational Economics
Abstract:In discrete choice experiments (DCEs), differences between respondents' preferences may be associated with observable or unobservable factors. Unobservable heterogeneity, related to latent factors associated with the choices of individuals, may be modelled using correlated (i.e. informative heterogeneity) or uncorrelated (i.e. uninformative heterogeneity) individual-specific parameters of a logit model. In this study, we simulated unobservable heterogeneity among DCE respondents and compared the results of the maximum simulated likelihood (MSL) estimation of the mixed logit model when correctly specified and mis-specified. These results show that the MSL estimates are biased and can differ greatly from the true parameters, even when correctly specified. Before estimating a mixed logit model, we highly recommend that choice modellers conduct simulation analyses to assess the potential extent of biases before relying on the MSL estimates, particularly their variances and correlations, and then ultimately determine which model specification produces the least bias.
economics,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,management
What problem does this paper attempt to address?