Up‐front autologous stem cell transplant in peripheral T‐cell lymphoma patients achieving complete response after first‐line treatment: A multicentre real‐world analysis

Peipei Yang,Mingci Cai,Yang Cao,Shuang Fan,Wei Tang,Mengmeng Ji,Liang Huang,Fengrong Wang,Weili Zhao,Ting Niu,Xiaodong Mo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19317
2024-01-27
British Journal of Haematology
Abstract:We enrolled 347 PTCL patients who achieved complete response after first‐line treatment. Of these, 257 received consolidation chemotherapy (non‐ASCT group) and 90 received ASCT (ASCT group). Within the T‐cell lymphoma subgroup, the 2‐year cumulative incidence of TRM and relapse was 1.9% (95% CI: 0%–5.5%) versus 2.0% (0%–5.9%) (p = 0.985) and 24.7% (95% CI: 12.3%–37.1%) versus 47.1% (95% CI: 32.8%–61.5%) (p = 0.021), respectively, for the ASCT and non‐ASCT groups. ASCT patients exhibited favourable outcomes compared to non‐ASCT patients: 2‐year progression‐free survival (73.4% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.024) and overall survival (92.1% vs. 73.5%, p = 0.021). These real‐world data suggest that up‐front ASCT is a safe and effective consolidation option for PTCL patients in remission, particularly those with T‐cell lymphoma. Summary We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study to compare consolidation therapy with or without first‐line autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients in a real‐world setting. We enrolled 347 PTCL patients who achieved complete response after first‐line treatment. Of these, 257 received consolidation chemotherapy (non‐ASCT group) and 90 received ASCT (ASCT group). Clinical outcomes were comparable between ASCT and non‐ASCT groups. After propensity score matching, the 2‐year cumulative incidence of treatment‐related mortality and relapse remained similar between groups (1.9% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.985; 24.7% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.021). However, significant differences emerged in progression‐free survival and overall survival probabilities. Within the T‐cell lymphoma subgroup, ASCT patients exhibited favourable outcomes compared to non‐ASCT patients: 2‐year progression‐free survival (73.4% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.024) and overall survival (92.1% vs. 73.5%, p = 0.021). Notably, no significant differences were observed for patients with NK/T‐cell lymphoma. These real‐world data suggest that up‐front ASCT is a safe and effective consolidation option for PTCL patients in remission, particularly those with T‐cell lymphoma.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?