P855 Have biological agents changed the need for abdominal surgery in inflammatory bowel disease over time?

C Suria,M M Bosca-Watts,A García-Trueba,J Tosca,C Antón,A Sanahuja,V Merino,C Abril,M P Ballester,E Romero,D Marti,C Galvez,M Ponce,I Pascual,IBD Unit,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0985
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic relapsing-remitting inflammatory intestinal disorder with two main categories: Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). CD patients can develop strictures and penetrating complications over time, that can lead to an increased number of bowel resections which, if extensive, can end up as short bowel syndromes. Aggresive UC is related to an increased colectomy rate. Controlling flares in CD and achieving mucosal healing in UC may decrease the need for abdominal surgery. Irruption of biological agents at the begining of the twenty-first century could be related to the fulfillment of both objectives decreasing number of surgeries. Our aim was to analyze the impact of biological treatment in abdominal surgery among patients with CD and UC. Methods We conducted a retrospective two cohort study of patients with IBD and abdominal surgery, using our prospectively collected ENEIDA data base. Patients were included in two periods of time, before and after biological irruption. The first cohort included all the patients operated between 1993 and 1998 (before biologics) and the second one between 2013 and 2018. We analyzed differences in the number of surgeries per patient and time between IBD diagnosis and first surgery, among other variables. Results We included 55 patients (89.1% CD and 10.9% UC) in the first cohort and 69 patients (82.6% CD and 17.4% UC) in the second one. 44 patients in the second cohort (63.8%) received biological agents before first surgery. There were no significant differences in the number of surgeries (two or more) per patient in both periods of time (10.9% vs 7.3%, p 0.69). The main indication of surgery was strictures (44.6% vs 46.6%) followed by penetrating complications (25.0% vs 30.1%) and medical refractoriness (21.4% vs 15.1%). No differences were observed in the reason to indicate surgery (p 0.78). The main surgical procedure was ileocecal resection (60.0% vs 54.1%), followed by small bowel resection (11.7% vs 17.6%) and proctocolectomy (10.0% vs 5.4%), without significant differences over time (p 0.67). There were 7 immediate post-surgical complications in both cohorts (11.3% vs 9.5%) without significant differences between them (p 0.94). The median time between IBD diagnosis and first surgery was greater among patients in the second cohort who had received any biological agent (19.0 vs 71.2 months, p<0.05), [image 1]. Conclusion Biological treatment considerably increases the time between IBD diagnosis and the first surgery. Future research will allow us to determine if this is associated to less surgeries in each patient and a reduction in long-term post-surgery complications (short-bowel syndrome, abdominal adhesions, eventrations, etc).
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?