Activity‐Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex of Male Rats Underlies Resilience‐Related Behaviors to Social Adversity

Corinne J. Montes‐Rodríguez,Erika D. Hernández‐Reyes,Vanessa Piña‐Díaz,Zeidy Muñoz‐Torres,Itzel Pérez‐Zarazúa,Emiliano Urteaga‐Urías,Oscar Prospéro‐García
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.25377
IF: 4.433
2024-09-16
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Abstract:One adverse social experience in adulthood such as social defeat promotes vulnerability. Two adverse social experiences during development (maternal separation + social defeat) foster resilience. Activity‐dependent plasticity in the mPFC seems to be crucial for resilience to social adversity. Individuals considered resilient can overcome adversity, achieving normal physical and psychological development, while those deemed vulnerable may not. Adversity promotes structural and functional alterations in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus. Moreover, activity‐dependent synaptic plasticity is intricately linked to neuronal shaping resulting from experiences. We hypothesize that this plasticity plays a crucial role in resilience processes. However, there is a notable absence of studies investigating this plasticity and behavioral changes following social adversity at different life stages. Consequently, we evaluated the impact of social adversity during early postnatal development (maternal separation [MS]), adulthood (social defeat [SD]), and a combined exposure (MS + SD) on behavioral outcomes (anxiety, motivation, anhedonia, and social interaction). We also examined cFos expression induced by social interaction in mPFC and hippocampus of adult male rats. Behavioral analyses revealed that SD‐induced anhedonia, whereas MS + SD increased social interaction and mitigated SD‐induced anhedonia. cFos evaluation showed that social interaction heightened plasticity in the prelimbic (PrL) and infralimbic (IL) cortices, dentate gyrus (DG), CA3, and CA1. Social interaction‐associated plasticity was compromised in IL and PrL cortices of the MS and SD groups. Interestingly, social interaction‐induced plasticity was restored in the MS + SD group. Furthermore, plasticity was impaired in DG by all social stressors, and in CA3 was impaired by SD. Our findings suggest in male rats (i) two adverse social experiences during development foster resilience; (ii) activity‐dependent plasticity in the mPFC is a foundation for resilience to social adversity; (iii) plasticity in DG is highly susceptible to social adversity.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?