Abstract:Background: The number of patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) is increasing yearly; however, there is still a relative lack of specific, individualized, and standardized protocols for functional exercise after TKR. Quantitative rehabilitation training was developed to improve the recovery of postoperative joint function, increase patient satisfaction, shorten the length of the hospital stay, improve the quality of life, and promote rapid patient recovery. Aim: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of quantitative rehabilitation training based on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept with conventional rehabilitation training in the early rehabilitation of patients with TKR. Design: This was a single-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Inpatient department. Population: Participants were patients who underwent unilateral total knee replacement. Methods: Based on the ERAS concept, a quantitative rehabilitation training program was developed for the quantitative group, and the control group underwent conventional rehabilitation training. Seventy-eight patients undergoing TKR were randomly divided into two blinded groups: the quantitative rehabilitation group and the conventional rehabilitation group. The analysis was performed according to per-protocol practice. The primary outcome metric was the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS Score), and secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS), time to get out of bed for the first time after surgery, 6-minute-walk test (6MWT), quality-of-life score (SF-36), and number of days in the hospital. The incidence of postoperative complications was also recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in HSS scores between the two groups before surgery (P=0.967), but the quantitative rehabilitation training group had significantly higher scores at two weeks (P=0.031), 3 months (P<0.01), and 12 months (P<0.01) after surgery than did the conventional rehabilitation training group, and both groups had higher HSS scores than before surgery. The quantitative training group had significantly higher VAS scores at 24 hours and three days postoperatively than the conventional training group (P<0.01), while there was no statistical significance at any other time points. The quantitative rehabilitation group had an earlier time to get out of bed for the first time after surgery (P<0.01), a longer 6MWT distance (P=0.028), and higher patient satisfaction and quality of life scores (SF-36) (P<0.01) that did the control group. The number of days in the hospital was lower in the quantitative training group than in the control group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared with conventional rehabilitation training, quantitative rehabilitation training based on the ERAS concept was found to be safe and effective and can accelerate the recovery of joint function after surgery, shorten hospitalization time, improve patient satisfaction, and promote rapid recovery. Clinical rehabilitation impact: The quantitative rehabilitation training based on the ERAS concept provides a new program for rehabilitation exercises after total knee arthroplasty, which is safe and reliable, accelerates the recovery of joint function, and should be considered for clinical promotion.

Multidisciplinary approach toward enhanced recovery after surgery for total knee arthroplasty improves outcomes

Enhanced wound recovery after surgery care in patients with total knee arthroplasty: A meta‐analysis

Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized control trials

Enhanced recovery after surgery for major orthopedic surgery: a narrative review

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in total knee arthroplasty via midvastus approach: a randomized controlled trial

Developing an enhanced recovery after surgery program for oncology patients who undergo hip or knee reconstruction surgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in hip and knee replacement surgery: description of a multidisciplinary program to improve management of the patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery

Application of multi-disciplinary team nursing model enhances recovery after surgery for total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty

Optimizing outcomes: Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery in orthopedic surgery

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols: Advancements and Implementation Challenges

An enhanced recovery after surgery program for hip and knee arthroplasty

Expert Consensus in Enhanced Recovery after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in China:perioperative Management

Enhanced recovery short-stay hip and knee joint replacement program improves patients outcomes while reducing hospital costs

Enhanced recovery after surgery combined with quantitative rehabilitation training in early rehabilitation after total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Exploring the Advances and Strategies

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Lower Extremity Joint Arthroplasty: Using Observational Data to Identify the Optimal Combination of Components

Can an Enhanced Recovery Protocol Result in a Safe and Effective Outpatient Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative blood management following primary total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: Perspective in Elder Women

The effect of cold therapy combined with ERAS in the postoperative care of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Progress of Postoperative Analgesia of Orthopaedic Patients in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol