Assessment of an effective quantitative model with multi-criteria decision-making method for sustainable campus

Onur Aksoy,Sara Demir,Nazli Deniz Ersoz,Merve Dilman Gokkaya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32040-7
IF: 5.8
2024-01-21
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Abstract:Sustainability is a current topic in public open green spaces such as university campuses. In order to ensure the sustainability of the campus areas, it is necessary to determine the criteria for the sustainable campus landscape. Bursa Uludağ University Gorukle Campus in Bursa was chosen as the study area in this research. The aim of the study is to identify suitable sustainable campus criteria with a focus on landscape and to prioritize appropriate sustainable campus strategies determined according to these criteria. In this context, first, field studies and literature research were carried out. Second, sustainable campus criteria were classified as criteria and section. The section was then divided into credit. All these credits were ranked according to their priorities. Analytic hierarchy process, one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods, was used while ranking. According to the result of the criteria, planting landscape components were determined to be more important than structural landscape components. Among the section, the transport category was found as the highest priority criterion. The use of vegetable wastes as compost was also determined as the most important criterion among all credits. The method and findings of this research may set an example for determining priorities of the sustainable campus criteria in Turkey and developing countries with a participatory management approach.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to evaluate an effective quantitative model and determine the criteria for a sustainable campus through Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. Specifically, the objectives of the study are: 1. **Identify suitable criteria for a sustainable campus**: Focus on landscape aspects to determine the criteria suitable for a sustainable campus. 2. **Prioritize sustainable campus strategies**: Determine the priority of appropriate sustainable campus strategies based on these criteria. ### Research Background - **Concept of Sustainability**: Since the 1970s, sustainability has been a global concern. The 1987 Brundtland Report first defined the concept of sustainability. Over time, sustainability has been reinterpreted as the development of social, economic, and environmental aspects. - **Importance of University Campuses**: Universities play a significant role in social, economic, and political life, thus having important significance in ensuring sustainable development. University campuses are often seen as micro-city models, and their planning and management have a significant impact on the overall development of cities. - **Key Elements of a Sustainable Campus**: These include reducing energy consumption, recycling materials, conserving water resources, and encouraging green behaviors. These elements are particularly important in university campuses as the activities of students and staff lead to significant electricity consumption. ### Research Methods - **Study Area**: The study selected the Görükle Campus of Uludağ University in Bursa, Turkey, as the research object. The campus is located in the Nilüfer district of Bursa province, covering an area of 1212 hectares, including university buildings, dormitories, hospitals, canteens, forests, water bodies, and agricultural areas. - **Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)**: Specifically, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine and rank the criteria and strategies for a sustainable campus. - **Questionnaire Survey**: A questionnaire survey was conducted among university students, staff, and experts to collect data on the importance and priority of sustainable campus criteria. ### Main Findings - **Planting Landscape Elements are More Important than Structural Landscape Elements**: According to the AHP analysis results, planting landscape elements (0.57) are more important than structural landscape elements (0.43). - **Transportation is the Top Priority Criterion**: In the planting landscape components, transportation (0.136) is the top priority criterion; in the structural landscape components, transportation (0.098) is also the top priority criterion. - **Most Important Credit Items**: In the local environment section, increasing green area (0.0368) is the most important credit item; in the water resource efficiency section, using natural plants (0.0288) is the most important credit item. ### Conclusion This study successfully determined the priority of criteria and strategies for a sustainable campus through the AHP method, providing a reference for sustainable campus planning in Turkey and other developing countries. The results emphasize the importance of planting landscape elements and transportation in sustainable campuses and provide a scientific basis for future sustainable campus designs.