Abstract:Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Ahead of Print. Despite the notion that sexual consent is either granted or refused, its communication can sometimes be ambiguous. This uncertainty stems from the tendency to rely on implicit, nonverbal cues to indicate consent. Without clear, explicit communication, people might be encouraged to rely upon contextual information when assessing whether a sexual encounter was consensual. Perceived levels of intimacy and familiarity in a relationship might influence these perceptions, such that prior intimacy might lead to ambiguously communicated consent being interpreted as more consensual. Gender roles can dictate the behaviors expected in a sexual encounter, with female-initiated sexual violence against men potentially being perceived as more consensual than the inverse. The current study examined how relationship type (Experiments 1 and 2) and gender pairing (Experiment 2) influenced participants' perceptions of how consensual various sexual encounters were. Participants read a series of vignettes in which sexual consent was verbally granted, verbally rejected, or inferred using nonverbal cues. Additionally, the dyads' relationships were either described as dating, friends, or strangers. Following vignette presentation, participants provided judgments regarding how consensual the interactions were. Experiment 2 expanded upon this by manipulating the gender of the initiators and targets. When consent was not clearly indicated, more established relationships were associated with higher ratings of perceived consent. Male targets were attributed more responsibility for sexual interactions, and they were also believed to want nonconsensual sex more than female targets. These findings highlight the importance of contextual information in instances where sexual consent is unclear.

From choosing sides to changing minds: A taxonomy of behavioral responses to social network disapproval of one's romantic relationship and evidence for the importance of commitment

The act of rejecting reduces the desire to reconnect: Evidence for a cognitive dissonance account

Fighting the good fight: Relating warmth and dominance across romantic conflict to resolution

Dispositional compassion shifts social preferences in systematic ways

Perceived Social Support Buffers the Consequences of Internalized Negativity Among Individuals in Consensual Non-Monogamous Relationships

Emerging Adults’ Perceptions of Acceptable Behaviors Prior to Forming a Committed, Dating Relationship

Predicting commitment in young adults' physically aggressive and sexually coercive dating relationships

The effects of conflict resolution styles on perceived relational self-concept change

The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan information.

Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships.

Romantic relationship stages and social networking sites: uncertainty reduction strategies and perceived relational norms on facebook

Social Anxiety and Pro-social Behavior Following Varying Degrees of Rejection: Piloting a New Experimental Paradigm

Ready for the next step: Novel commitment amplification in romantic relationships

Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model.

Being Together Apart: Does Communication via Social Media Help or Harm Romantic Relationships?

Neuroticism's ties to relationship satisfaction: the role of conflict tactic behaviors

Yes, No, Maybe So: The Effects of Relationship Status on Perceptions of Inferred Consent

Stepping into their shoes: Reducing the actor-observer discrepancy in judgments of infidelity through the experimental manipulation of perspective-taking

What Happens in Initial Interactions Forecasts Relationship Development: Showcasing the Role of Social Behavior

"You're still worth it": The moral and relational context of politically motivated unfriending decisions in online networks

Refusal and Acceptance in Reciprocal Social Exchange