Abstract:Maintaining the well-being of the older adults is a primary concern in gerontology. This study determined different profiles of well-being (WB) and compared the profiles in terms of successful aging (SA), personality, and sociodemographic variables. The study sample consisted of 856 adults aged 65–98 years. WB was taken into account in an eudemonic and hedonic approach. SA was measured by assessing the three distinct components of Rowe and Kahn's model (Successful aging. Gerontol 37(4):433–440. 10.1093/geront/37.4.433, 1997), personality by the Big Five Inventory, and sociodemographic variables. Latent class analyses (LCA) determined the number of WB profiles, and ANOVAs and Chi2 tests to compare them. The LCA revealed three WB profiles: Profile 1 (9.35%, n = 80), Profile 2 (37.38%, n = 320), and Profile 3 (53.27%, n = 456) in which participants reported lower, intermediate, and higher WB scores. Our results confirm that a high level of WB (Profile 3) can be linked to the components of SA and socio-demographic characteristics (age, marital status, level of education, income). This raises questions about the injunctions concerning healthy aging that older people integrate. It's also interesting to note that the intermediate profile (profile 2) can be either close to the "lower WB" profile (Profile 1) in terms of openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness or to the "higher WB" profile (Profile 3) in terms of extraversion. However the three profiles do not have the same level of neuroticism. These results also showed the importance of adapting the support offered to older people according to their health status and/or individual characteristics.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to identify different well - being (WB) characteristics among the French elderly population and explore the relationships between these characteristics and successful aging (SA), personality traits, and sociodemographic variables. Specifically, the research aims to:
1. **Identify different well - being characteristics**: Determine different well - being characteristics by analyzing the psychological well - being (PWB) and subjective well - being (SWB) of the elderly.
2. **Compare the differences between different well - being characteristics**: Compare the differences between different well - being characteristics in terms of successful aging, personality traits, and sociodemographic variables.
### Research Background
With the increase in life expectancy, maintaining the well - being of the elderly has become increasingly important. Well - being can be divided into two main types:
- **Psychological well - being (PWB)**: Emphasizes the importance of personal growth and self - actualization, including aspects such as self - control and self - actualization.
- **Subjective well - being (SWB)**: Focuses on the pleasure, comfort, and happiness felt by individuals, including life satisfaction and emotional experiences.
### Research Methods
- **Sample**: The study selected 856 French elderly people aged between 65 and 98 years.
- **Measurement Tools**:
- **Well - being**: Use the CASP - 12 scale to measure the sense of control, self - actualization, and pleasure; use a single - item scale to measure life satisfaction and self - rated health.
- **Successful aging**: According to Rowe and Kahn's model, evaluate chronic diseases, cognitive abilities, and physical functions.
- **Personality traits**: Use the Big Five Inventory (BFI - 10) to measure openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.
- **Sociodemographic variables**: Include age, gender, education level, marital status, and annual family income.
### Research Results
- **Well - being characteristics**: Through latent class analysis (LCA), three different well - being characteristics were determined:
- **Characteristic 1** (9.35%, n = 80): Lower well - being.
- **Characteristic 2** (37.38%, n = 320): Moderate well - being.
- **Characteristic 3** (53.27%, n = 456): Higher well - being.
- **Differences between different characteristics**:
- **Successful aging**: The elderly in characteristic 3 performed better in terms of chronic diseases, cognitive abilities, and physical functions.
- **Personality traits**: The elderly in characteristic 3 scored higher in openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness, and lower in neuroticism.
- **Sociodemographic variables**: The elderly in characteristic 3 were younger, had higher incomes, were more educated, and were more likely to live with a spouse or partner.
### Discussion
The research results show that most of the elderly (53.27%) have a higher level of well - being, which is in line with the criteria for successful aging. However, the elderly belonging to the lower well - being characteristic (characteristic 1) performed poorly in terms of successful aging, personality traits, and sociodemographic variables. These findings raise thoughts on how the elderly internalize the instructions for healthy aging, especially the role of individual subjective feelings in this process.
### Conclusion
This study provides a new perspective for understanding the well - being of the elderly through a comprehensive analysis of the well - being characteristics of the elderly and their relationships with successful aging, personality traits, and sociodemographic variables. These results are helpful for formulating more personalized support measures to promote the health and well - being of the elderly.