Endonasal Thermal Imaging Before and After Nasal Airway Surgery

Kachorn Seresirikachorn,Lu Hui Png,Timothy Quy-Phong Do,Larry Kalish,Raewyn G. Campbell,Janet Rimmer,Raquel Alvarado,Nelufer Raji,Christine Choy,Kornkiat Snidvongs,Raymond Sacks,Richard J. Harvey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241287003

2024-10-03

Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology

Abstract:Annals of Otology, Rhinology &Laryngology, Ahead of Print. ObjectiveNasal airway surgery is often applied when treatment fails to relieve nasal obstruction. However, surgery that improves airflow does not always alleviate the symptoms of nasal obstruction. The perception of nasal breathing is likely more related to changes in mucosal temperature than the mechanical sensation of flow or pressure. This study aims to measure intranasal mucosal temperature pre-and post-surgery using endonasal thermal imaging, exploring its correlation with subjective nasal breathing and objective airflow measurements.MethodsA prospective study of adult patients with nasal obstruction managed with nasal airway surgery was performed. Intranasal mucosal temperatures were determined using the thermal endonasal image of the nasal passage produced by the infrared radiometric thermal camera (FILR VS290). A comparison was made between the mean values of mid-expiration (ExT) and mid-inspiration (InT) temperature data (internal nasal valve, nasal cavity, inferior turbinate, and overall airway [mean value]) and visual analog scale (VAS), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and nasal airway resistance (NAR) before and after surgery.ResultsSeven patients (35.14 ± 16.45 years, 57.14% female) were included. All NOSE, VAS, and NAR improved after surgery (59.29 ± 10.89 vs 17.14 ± 14.64; P < .001, 64.50 ± 26.79 vs 18.57 ± 19.99; P < .001, 0.82 ± 0.48 vs 0.34 ± 0.11 Pa/cm3/s; P = .002, respectively). ExT, InT, and the difference between ExT and InT of three areas and overall airway were similar between pre-and post-surgery. No statistically significant correlations were found between intranasal mucosal temperature, VAS, NOSE, and NAR at pre-and post-surgery except for the difference between ExT and InT of overall airway and NOSE pre-operative (Pearson r = 0.57; 95% CI 0.06-1.09; P = .03).ConclusionEndonasal thermal imaging can assess the intranasal mucosal temperature of a patient. However, more precise imaging of the nasal passages and data acquisition are required to establish mucosal temperature as an objective measure of nasal obstruction before and after nasal airway surgery in a clinical setting.

otorhinolaryngology