Abstract:Previous research suggested that socially anxious individuals might form threatening interpretations of positive facial stimuli. However, some studies failed to provide empirical evidence of an interpretation bias toward positive faces. These studies may have several methodological limitations that the present study attempted to overcome. And none of them assessed the interpretations bias, if existent, over time. The present study tried to figure out whether the socially anxious individuals were characterized by an interpretation bias towards positive facial stimuli, and investigated whether this interpretation bias tends to occur at an early stage in the interpretation process of positive stimuli, or it occurs at a later stage.The current study consisted of a 2 (stimulus duration type) × 2 (group type) mixed factorial design. The within-subjects factor of duration type had two levels (long vs. brief durations), and the between-subjects factor of group type had two levels (high vs. low social anxiety groups). Before the experiment, the participants first finished a package of questionnaires (SIAS, SPS, BFNE). Then, they were told that they would conduct an impromptu speaking task after the experiment, and their performance would be assessed. The participants were made convinced that the experiment was about to test their social and presentation skills. After the experiment, no speaking task would be performed. They were debriefed and explained about the design. In the experiment, a positive face and a matched neutral face were presented on the screen at the same time for each trial. The participants, who scored high and low on the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale, were instructed to imagine that these faces represented the audience in their coming speaking task, and they were asked to identify the facial displays that they subjectively perceived to be more threatening. The matched positive and neutral facial displays were presented at both long (unlimited) and brief (60ms) stimulus durations. By doing so, interpretation biases to perceiving threat in positive facial stimuli were assessed over time under the public speaking situation. The numbers of the positive facial displays, which were chosen to be more threatening when compared with the neutral ones, were recorded by the program. The dependent variables were analyzed with repeated measure ANOVA.The results showed that the high-social-anxiety participants chose significantly more positive facial stimuli than the low-social-anxiety participants at long stimulus durations, while no difference between groups was found at brief stimulus durations. We come to the conclusion that in contrast to the control group the high-social-anxiety participants are characterized by an interpretation bias towards positive facial stimuli, and are more likely to perceive them in a more threatening way in social interaction. It also suggests that only at long durations, the participants with high vs. low social anxiety tended to interpret positive facial stimuli in different fashions. Based on these findings, we then propose that this interpretation bias for positive facial displays in socially anxious individuals may occur at a later stage in the interpretation process of positive stimuli.

Negative interpretation bias towards ambiguous facial expressions in individuals with high empathy

Interpretation bias for ambiguous scenarios among individuals with high and low levels of empathy

Emotion category-modulated interpretation bias in perceiving ambiguous facial expressions

Biased Attention Towards Negative Schematic Expression in Abstinent Heroin Abusers.

Biased Perception of Mean Emotion in Abstinent Heroin Abusers

Facial Expression Processing of People with Different Empathic Abilities:An ERP Study

Facial Perception Bias in Patients with Major Depression.

Ambiguity Processing Bias Induced by Depressed Mood is Associated with Diminished Pleasantness

The Influence of Emotional State on Empathic Accuracy

Social Anxiety and Interpretation Bias: Effect of Positive Priming.

Automatic Processing of Changes in Facial Emotions in Dysphoria: A Magnetoencephalography Study

Interpretation of ambiguous facial affect in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Interpretative biases for positive faces in high socially anxious individuals

Relationship between low mood and micro-expression processing: evidence of negative bias in interpreting fleeting facial expressions

An Experimental Study of Attentional Bias to Negative Emotion Facial Expressions in High Trait Anger Individuals

The Neural Mechanism Underlying the Female Advantage in Identifying Negative Emotions: an Event-Related Potential Study.

Early perceptual anomaly of negative facial expression in depression: An event-related potential study.

Interpretation Biases for Positive Facial Stimuli in Social Anxiety

The Positivity Bias Phenomenon in Face Perception Given Different Information on Ability

Alexithymia modulates emotion concept activation during facial expression processing

Perception of emotional facial expressions in aggression and psychopathy