Abstract:The accuracy of studies of drug-induced QTc changes depends, among others, on the accuracy of heart rate correction of QT interval. It has been recognized that when a drug leads to substantial heart rate changes, fixed universal corrections cannot be used and that alternative methods such as subject-specific corrections established for each study participant need to be considered. Nevertheless, the maximum heart rate change that permits use of fixed correction with reasonable accuracy has not been systematically investigated. We have therefore used full QT/heart-rate profiles of 751 healthy subjects (mean age 34.2 ± 9.6, range 18-61 years, 335 females) and compared their subject-specific corrections with 6 fixed corrections, namely Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham, Hodges, Rautaharju, and Sarma formulae. The comparison was based on statistical modeling experiments which simulated clinical studies of N = 10 or N = 50 female or male subjects. The experiments compared errors of ΔQTc intervals calculated as differences between QTc intervals at an initial heart rate (in the range of 40 to 120 beats per minute, bpm) and after a heart rate change (in the range from -20 to +20 bpm). The experiments also investigated errors due to spontaneous heart rate fluctuation and due to omission of correction for QT/RR hysteresis. In each experiment, the absolute value of the single-sided 90th percentile most remote from zero was used as the error estimate. Each experiment was repeated 10,000 times with random selection of modeled study group. From these repetitions, median and upper 80th percentile was derived and graphically displayed for all different combinations of initial heart rate and heart rate change. The results showed that Fridericia formula might be reasonable (with estimated errors of ΔQTc below 8 ms) in large studies if the heart rate does not change more than ± 10 bpm and that the errors by fixed corrections and the errors due to omission of QR/RR hysteresis are additive. Additionally, the results suggest that the variability introduced into QTc data by not correcting for the underlying heart rate accurately might have a greater impact in smaller studies. The errors by Framingham formula were practically the same as with the Fridericia formula. Other investigated fixed heart rate corrections led to larger ΔQTc errors.

Impact of Heart Rate and Rhythm on Corrected QT Interval During Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

The effects of amiodarone on QT dispersion in patients with atrial fibrillation

Study on Changes of QTc、STc、Tc in Surface Electrocardiogram of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Prolonged Corrected QT Interval in Predicting Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

QTc interval prolongation and risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence: a meta-analysis and observational cohort study

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Clinical Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Thrombolytic Therapy

Optimal QT Correction Formula for Older Chinese: Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study

Errors of Fixed QT Heart Rate Corrections Used in the Assessment of Drug-Induced QTc Changes

Relevance of accurate QT correction in the assessment of long QT syndrome

Marked QTc Reduction Immediately Following Direct Current Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Implications and Mechanisms

Circadian Rhythm of the Corrected QT Interval: Impact of Different Heart Rate Correction Models

The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Accuracy of Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurement: Effect of Ventricular Rate

Intraoperative QTc interval interpretation: Effects of anaesthesia, ECG, correction formulae, sex, and current limits

Validation of a Demography-Based Adaptive QTc Formula using Pediatric and Adult Datasets Acquired from Humans and Guinea Pigs

Corrected QT Interval is Associated with Stroke but Not Coronary Heart Disease: Insights from a General Chinese Population.

Correlation of Supraventricular Tachycardia During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedure

A Computational Study on the Relation between Resting Heart Rate and Atrial Fibrillation Hemodynamics under Exercise

The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Is 10-Second Electrocardiogram Recording Enough for Accurately Estimating Heart Rate in Atrial Fibrillation.

Differences in Heart Rate Response and Recovery after 6-Minute Walk Test Between Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and in Sinus Rhythm

Universal Correction for QT/RR Hysteresis