Air Pollution Exposure at Time of Lung Transplant and Survival: Can We Do Better?

Natalia Belousova,Chung-Wai Chow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41127

2024-10-18

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:Lung transplant is a life-saving treatment for selected patients with end-stage lung disease. However, lung transplant recipients have significantly shorter posttransplant survival compared with recipients of other solid organ transplants, which has been partially attributed to the lung's exposure to the outside environment and airborne irritants, including infectious organisms, pollutants, smoke, and dust particles. Air pollution likely contributes to ongoing graft injury and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). These potential associations have not been extensively studied. The study by Amubieya et al 1 investigated this important issue by examining the association between residential zip code–level exposure to PM 2.5 , fine particulate matter with an aerodiameter of 2.5 μm or less, and graft outcomes in a cohort of 18 265 lung transplant recipients in the US. The authors estimated PM 2.5 exposure using residential zip code and previously published data, adjusting for baseline patient characteristics. A cutoff PM 2.5 level of 12 μ/m 3 was used to define zip codes with high vs low PM 2.5 exposure. Recipients who resided in a high-exposure zip code at the time of transplant (10% of the cohort) had increased risk for the composite outcome of death or graft failure, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.08. There remained an association when PM 2.5 level was modeled as a continuous variable, with a hazard ratio of 1.01 for each additional 1 μg/m 3 of exposure. The association also remained in a sensitivity analysis using a cutoff of 9 μ/m 3 , the updated Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard as of February 2024. Prior studies of air pollution in lung transplant recipients have demonstrated an increased incidence of CLAD and all-cause mortality among patients exposed to higher levels of PM 10 (PM <10 μm diameter) 2 and lower posttransplant forced vital capacity among patients exposed to higher levels of PM 10 and PM 2.5 . 3 Other studies estimating air pollution exposure by residential proximity to major roadways or the road density within a certain radius of the patient's home have also found increased incidence of CLAD. 3 -5 This study adds to the small body of literature on the association of air pollution with outcomes after lung transplant. The study evaluated the largest cohort of lung transplant recipients thus far and focused on PM 2.5 . This is a major component of air pollution that can penetrate into the small airways, and multiple studies have already found it to be associated with poorer health outcomes in the general population. Like Benmerad et al, 3 the authors in this study used previously published nationwide data to estimate mean annual pollution levels in each patient's area of residence. While the study by Benmerad et al 3 focused on longitudinal posttransplant lung function outcomes, this study examined only the baseline exposure at the time of transplant. Thus, it is even more remarkable that an association was found between early exposure and poor outcomes when granular data, such as seasonal variation and cumulative exposure during the calendar year, were not considered. There are inevitable limitations of a study relying on registry data, including a lack of details regarding individual exposures and the effect of potential confounders. The authors acknowledged and discussed these limitations. Only the residential zip code at time of transplant was analyzed. Therefore, patients who relocated early after transplant and the potential changes in air pollution exposure during this time could not be evaluated. Furthermore, no information was available on the duration of the index hospitalization. Patients with a more difficult posttransplant course are likely to remain hospitalized longer, potentially for months. For these patients, baseline exposure is likely reflected by the zip code of the hospital and, more accurately, by pollution levels in the likely air-conditioned indoor environment of the hospital, rather than the patient's home zip code. Additionally, while the authors postulate that immune dysregulation and allosensitization may be some of the mechanisms by which air pollution contributes to poor graft outcomes, there are no data presented in this study that allow for analysis of these potential associations; variables associated with rejection risk, such as donor-recipient crossmatch status, were not included in the analysis. The association of air pollution with negative health outcomes is increasingly acknowledged to be a major health issue in developing and developed countries. Indeed, the limits of safe exposures have decreased over time as more data have become available. Notably, the EPA lowered the PM -Abstract Truncated-

medicine, general & internal