Lithium isotopes in water and regolith in a deep weathering profile reveal imbalances in Critical Zone fluxes

Di Cai,Michael J. Henehan,David Uhlig,Friedhelm von Blanckenburg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.01.012
IF: 5
2024-01-20
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Abstract:To trace Critical Zone processes and to quantify Li fluxes from one Critical Zone compartment into another, we investigated the Li concentration and isotopic composition (δ 7 Li) of time-series water samples (including subsurface flow, groundwater and creek water), vegetation, bedrock (including separated minerals from bedrock), and regolith (including exchangeable fraction and clay-sized fraction of regolith) in a temperate forested headwater catchment in the Black Forest, Conventwald, Germany. Our estimation of the Li budget shows that atmospheric deposition and biological processes played minor roles in the Li cycle relative to chemical weathering. All water samples (δ 7 Li value of 6.5 to 20.4‰) were enriched in 7 Li compared to bedrock (-1.3‰) and regolith (∼-1.7‰), but δ 7 Li differed between water pathways: δ 7 Li variations in subsurface flow, creek water and groundwater were controlled by conservative mixing, exchangeable pool buffering and Li incorporation/adsorption, respectively. Fractionated heavy Li isotopes in water samples resulted from the formation of secondary solids which preferentially incorporated 6 Li, with the separated clay-sized fraction of the regolith exhibiting more negative δ 7 Li values (-5.4 to -3.5‰) than the bulk regolith (∼-1.7‰). However, Li in secondary solids only accounted for 8 ± 6% of the total Li hosted in bulk regolith, and consequently δ 7 Li in soil did not differ significantly from δ 7 Li in bedrock. This is unexpected considering water is continuously removing 7 Li in preference over 6 Li from regolith. Mass balance calculations applied at the catchment scale point to an irreconcilable imbalance with our data. On one hand, the regolith's δ 7 Li values are not negative enough to balance the 7 Li export by river water, and on the other hand Li in the riverine dissolved load only accounts for ∼30% of the Li solubilized from regolith. Therefore, we suggest that there might be a "hidden export pathway" for Li at our site, possibly subsurface removal of fine particles enriched in 6 Li. In light of increasingly frequent observations of such isotopic imbalances in the Critical Zone this phenomenon deserves increased attention.
geochemistry & geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?