Oncological and reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in patients with seromucinous borderline ovarian tumor: Results of a large retrospective study

Dan Wang,Shuangzheng Jia,Congwei Jia,Dongyan Cao,Jiaxin Yang,Junjun Yang,Yang Xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.04.002
IF: 5.304
2022-04-01
Gynecologic Oncology
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the oncological and reproductive outcomes in patients with seromucinous borderline ovarian tumors (SMBOT) treated with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS).METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with SMBOT who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2019. A centralized histological review was performed and recurrence rates were compared between different surgical procedures.RESULTS: A total of 105 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of whom 65 underwent FSS and 40 were treated with radical surgery (RS). Fourteen patients had recurrent disease after a median follow-up time of 59.6 months (range: 22.1-256.8 months). All but one relapsed with SMBOT. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups (P = 0.141). Multivariate analysis showed that only bilateral involvement was associated with increased recurrence (P = 0.008). In the subgroup of patients treated with conservative surgery, there was no significant difference in DFS with regard to surgical procedures (ovarian cystectomy vs salpingo-oophorectomy, P = 0.487). Of the 12 patients in the FSS group who developed recurrence, 11 underwent a second round of FSS and all remained alive with no evidence of disease at the end of follow-up. Of 20 patients desiring pregnancy, 16 patients were successful and resulted in 17 term deliveries.CONCLUSIONS: FSS is feasible for young patients who wish to preserve their fertility. Patients initially treated with ovarian cystectomy may be managed by close surveillance if post-operative imaging are negative. Repeat FSS remains a valuable alternative for young patients with recurrent SMBOT after thorough communication.
oncology,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?