Abstract:Background: Cemiplimab provided significant survival benefit to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumour expression of at least 50% and no actionable biomarkers at 1-year follow-up. In this exploratory analysis, we provide outcomes after 35 months' follow-up and the effect of adding chemotherapy to cemiplimab at the time of disease progression. Methods: EMPOWER-Lung 1 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. We enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed squamous or non-squamous advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumour expression of 50% or more. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to intravenous cemiplimab 350 mg every 3 weeks for up to 108 weeks, or until disease progression, or investigator's choice of chemotherapy. Central randomisation scheme generated by an interactive web response system governed the randomisation process that was stratified by histology and geographical region. Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression free survival, as assessed by a blinded independent central review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. Patients with disease progression on cemiplimab could continue cemiplimab with the addition of up to four cycles of chemotherapy. We assessed response in these patients by BICR against a new baseline, defined as the last scan before chemotherapy initiation. The primary endpoints were assessed in all randomly assigned participants (ie, intention-to-treat population) and in those with a PD-L1 expression of at least 50%. We assessed adverse events in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088540. Findings: Between May 29, 2017, and March 4, 2020, we recruited 712 patients (607 [85%] were male and 105 [15%] were female). We randomly assigned 357 (50%) to cemiplimab and 355 (50%) to chemotherapy. 284 (50%) patients assigned to cemiplimab and 281 (50%) assigned to chemotherapy had verified PD-L1 expression of at least 50%. At 35 months' follow-up, among those with a verified PD-L1 expression of at least 50% median overall survival in the cemiplimab group was 26·1 months (95% CI 22·1-31·8; 149 [52%] of 284 died) versus 13·3 months (10·5-16·2; 188 [67%] of 281 died) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·57, 95% CI 0·46-0·71; p<0·0001), median progression-free survival was 8·1 months (95% CI 6·2-8·8; 214 events occurred) in the cemiplimab group versus 5·3 months (4·3-6·1; 236 events occurred) in the chemotherapy group (HR 0·51, 95% CI 0·42-0·62; p<0·0001). Continued cemiplimab plus chemotherapy as second-line therapy (n=64) resulted in a median progression-free survival of 6·6 months (6·1-9·3) and overall survival of 15·1 months (11·3-18·7). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (15 [4%] of 356 patients in the cemiplimab group vs 60 [17%] of 343 in the control group), neutropenia (three [1%] vs 35 [10%]), and pneumonia (18 [5%] vs 13 [4%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in ten (3%) of 356 patients treated with cemiplimab (due to autoimmune myocarditis, cardiac failure, cardio-respiratory arrest, cardiopulmonary failure, septic shock, tumour hyperprogression, nephritis, respiratory failure, [n=1 each] and general disorders or unknown [n=2]) and in seven (2%) of 343 patients treated with chemotherapy (due to pneumonia and pulmonary embolism [n=2 each], and cardiac arrest, lung abscess, and myocardial infarction [n=1 each]). The safety profile of cemiplimab at 35 months, and of continued cemiplimab plus chemotherapy, was generally consistent with that previously observed for these treatments, with no new safety signals INTERPRETATION: At 35 months' follow-up, the survival benefit of cemiplimab for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer was at least as pronounced as at 1 year, affirming its use as first-line monotherapy for this population. Adding chemotherapy to cemiplimab at progression might provide a new second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Funding: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi.

Breaking boundaries: Exploring extended pembrolizumab in first-line treatment of renal cell carcinoma with axitinib-pembrolizumab combination.

Abstract CT555: Pembrolizumab Vs Chemotherapy in Chinese Patients with PD-L1-positive NSCLC: 4-Year Update from KEYNOTE-042 China Study

Immune-Related Adverse Events Can Predict Progression-Free and Overall Survival In Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Pemetrexed and Platinum with or Without Pembrolizumab for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Tki)-Resistant, EGFR-mutant, Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC: Phase 3 KEYNOTE-789 Study

457 Efficacy of pembrolizumab as cross-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-center non-interventional study from China

A Multi-Center Phase II Study of Toripalimab with Chemotherapy in Patients with EGFR Mutant Advanced NSCLC Patients Resistant to EGFR TKIs: Efficacy and Biomarker Analysis.

Real-world treatment outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who receive axitinib plus pembrolizumab in the first-line setting in Canadian cancer centers.

First-line pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib for non–clear cell renal carcinomas (nccRCC): Extended follow-up of the phase 2 KEYNOTE-B61 study.

Evaluation of Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Retrospective, Single-Centre, Single-Arm Study.

First-line Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Longer-term Efficacy, Safety, and Quality-of-life Results from the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-590 Study.

Phase Ib of pembrolizumab (pem) in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for resectable liver oligometastatic MMR-proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC): Final results.

First-line cemiplimab monotherapy and continued cemiplimab beyond progression plus chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 50% or more (EMPOWER-Lung 1): 35-month follow-up from a mutlicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

Durable Response to the Combination of Atezolizumab with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in an Untreated Non-Smoking Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient with BRAF V600E Mutation: A Case Report

Long-term treatment results of pembrolizumab monotherapy: reconsideration of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy

Real-world (RW) characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) treated with pemigatinib.

Immunotherapy after progression to double immunotherapy: pembrolizumab and lenvatinib versus conventional chemotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma after failure of PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition

ENGOT-cx11/KEYNOTE-A18: A phase III, randomized, double-blind study of pembrolizumab with chemoradiotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer.

Optimizing PD-L1 As a Biomarker of Response with Pembrolizumab (pembro; MK-3475) As First-Line Therapy for PD-L1–positive Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Updated Data from KEYNOTE-001.

Three-year Follow-Up Data from KEYNOTE-966: Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin (gem/cis) Compared with Gem/cis Alone for Patients (pts) with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC).

Optimization of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment planning for relapsed or refractory extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma

KEYNOTE-826: Final overall survival results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs placebo + chemotherapy for first-line treatment of persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.