Over 1‐year duration and age difference of SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies in convalescent COVID‐19 patients

Fanfan Zeng,Mengjun Wu,Jinbiao Wang,Jianyu Li,Guoyun Hu,Lin Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27152
IF: 20.693
2021-07-26
Journal of Medical Virology
Abstract:<p>Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies have been widely used to assist clinical diagnosis. Our previous study reported a discrepancy in SARS-CoV-2 antibody response between male and female COVID-19 patients. However, the duration and discrepancy between ages as well as sexes of SARS-CoV-2 antibody in convalescent COVID-19 patients have not been clarified. In this study, a total of 538 health-examination individuals who were confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection one year ago were enrolled. Blood samples were collected and detected for IgM and IgG antibodies. Among these convalescent patients, 12.80% were detected positive for IgM antibody. The positive rates for IgM antibody were close between sexes: for male is 9.17% and for female is 13.75%. While the IgG antibody detected positive in as much as 82.90% convalescent patients and the positive rates were nearly the same between males (82.57%) and females (82.98%). Besides, the level of IgM and IgG antibodies showed no difference between male and female convalescent patients. The level of IgG antibody showed significant difference between ages. The elder patients (over 35 years old) maintained a higher level of IgG antibody than the younger patients (under or equal 35 years old) after recovered for one year. In addition, IgG antibody was more vulnerable to disappear in younger patients than in elder patients. Overall, our study identified over one-year duration of SARS-CoV-2 antibody and age difference of IgG antibody response in convalescent COVID-19 patients. These findings may provide new insights into long-term humoral immune response, vaccines efficacy and age-based personalized vaccination strategies.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
virology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?