Abstract:Purpose of the study: The aim of this work was to assess the usefulness of specialized rehabilitation sessions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in high-level athletes participating in regional-, national-, or international-level sports. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective comparison between two populations: in the first, rehabilitation was limited to the early postoperative period (PO); in the second, rehabilitation sessions were repeated, once in the early postoperative period and again 90 days later (POR). The second rehabilitation period lasted two or three weeks and included an open and closed-chain muscle training program controlled by physical therapists using isokinetic devices. The sessions also included proprioceptive exercises and cardiovascular exercise reconditioning with a therapeutic project developed by the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation physician in collaboration with other health professionals and taking into consideration the surgical recommendations and the patient's clinical status. A questionnaire was addressed to all patients one year after the operation. The response rate was 55 %. Two groups were created at random: 74 patients were in the PO group and 75 in the POR group. The two populations were comparable in terms of gender (64 men, 10 women in PO versus 57 men and 18 women in POR), sports level (regional, national, international), type of surgery (41 hamsting, 33 bone-patellar tendon-bone in PO and 43 hamstring and 32 bone-patellar tendon-bone in POR) and sports (generally rugby, soccer, handball or ski). Results: Our results were statistically in favor of the group POR in terms of resumption of sports activities: time to return to training (7.6 versus 8.7 months, p=0.03) and time to return to competition (9.06 versus 10.84 months, p=0.007). They were also in favor of the group POR for resumption of sports activities at the former level (52.05 % versus 19.44 %, p=0.001), pain (numerical scale: 1.52 versus 2.03, p=0.021) and subjective impression (IKDC subjective score: 87.58 % versus 81.64 %, p=0.003). There was no significant difference for resumption of training (90.50 % versus 81.69 %, p=0.2) or competition (71.80 % versus 56.76 %, p=0.1) at one year, but the results were close to the level of significance. Discussion: Adapted preparation before returning to sports activities using a scheme elaborated by specialists (physicians, physical therapists, trainers) provided a statistically significant improvement in time and quality of resumed activity (return to prior level, pain, subjective IKDC score) in this specific population of high-level competition athletes. A larger series would be interesting to check the statistical significance of return to training and competition at one year. Another follow-up beyond one year (1.5 or two years for example) would also provide information on the percentage of definitive return to sports in these two populations.

To achieve the unachievable—Patients' experiences of opting for delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after trying rehabilitation alone as primary treatment: A qualitative study

Rehabilitation and recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patients' experiences

Perceptions of Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Among High School Athletes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Qualitative Research Study

Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Early surgical reconstruction versus rehabilitation with elective delayed reconstruction for patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture: COMPARE randomised controlled trial

Athletes' perspectives on return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and their strategies to reduce reinjury risk: a qualitative interview study

The End of the Formal Rehabilitation Is Not the End of Rehabilitation: Knee Function Deficits Remain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Comparative Effectiveness of Supervised and Home-Based Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Competitive Athletes

Demographic and surgical characteristics in patients who do not achieve minimal important change in the KOOS Sport/Rec and QoL after ACL reconstruction: a comparative study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry

How Athletic Swiss Patients Experience Their Return to Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results from a Retrospective Self-Assessment

[Interest of an iterative specialized rehabilitation after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in high level sport athletes]

Comparative Study on Outcome of Early Aggressive and Standard Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Controlled Accelerated Rehabilitation

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a pragmatic randomized trial evaluating surgical reconstruction versus rehabilitation in patients with long-standing anterior cruciate ligament injury

Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Patients: 3-Year Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes

'Going through the motions; a rich account of the complexity of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction pathway, a UK qualitative study

Anterior-Cruciate-Insufficient Knees Treated With Physiotherapy

Good rates of return-to-sport in athletes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous patellar tendon and lateral extra-articular tenodesis: a 2-year follow-up prospective study

Time for a Different Approach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Educate and Create Realistic Expectations

Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries With Special Reference to Surgical Technique and Rehabilitation: An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials

Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction: Exploring Physical Therapists' Approaches in Argentina