Abstract:AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety benefits of performing intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to treat symptomatic cholelithiasis.METHODS: Patients admitted to the Minimally Invasive Surgery Center of Tianjin Nankai Hospital between January 2012 and January 2014 for management of symptomatic cholelithiasis were recruited for this prospective randomized trial. Study enrollment was offered to patients with clinical presentation of biliary colic symptoms, radiological findings suggestive of gallstones, and normal serum biochemistry results. Study participants were randomized to receive either routine LC treatment or LC+IOC treatment. The routine LC procedure was carried out using the standard four-port technique; the LC+IOC procedure was carried out with the addition of meglumine diatrizoate (1:1 dilution with normal saline) injection via a catheter introduced through a small incision in the cystic duct made by laparoscopic scissors. Operative data and postoperative outcomes, including operative time, retained common bile duct (CBD) stones, CBD injury, other complications and length of hospital stay, were recorded for comparative analysis. Inter-group differences were statistically assessed by the χ2 test (categorical variables) and Fisher's exact test (binary variables), with the threshold for statistical significance set at P<0.05.RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were enrolled in the trial (late-adolescent to adult, age range: 16-70 years), with 185 assigned to the routine LC group and 186 to the LC+IOC group. The two treatment groups were similar in age, sex, body mass index, duration of symptomology, number and size of gallstones, and clinical symptoms. The two treatment groups also showed no significant differences in the rates of successful LC (98.38% vs 97.85%), CBD stone retainment (0.54% vs 0.00%), CBD injury (0.54% vs 0.53%) and other complications (2.16% vs 2.15%), as well as in duration of hospital stay (5.10±1.41 d vs 4.99±1.53 d). However, the LC+IOC treatment group showed significantly longer mean operative time (routine LC group: 43.00±4.15 min vs 52.86±4.47 min, P<0.01). There were no cases of fatal complications in either group. At the one-year follow-up assessment, one patient in the routine LC group reported experiencing diarrhea for three months after the LC and one patient in the LC+IOC group reported on-going intermittent epigastric discomfort, but radiological examination provided no abnormal findings.CONCLUSION: IOC addition to the routine LC treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis does not improve rates of CBD stone retainment or bile duct injury but lengthens operative time.

Benefits and risks of using laparoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The comparative analysis between two methods for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Laparoscopic Exploration of the Common Bile Duct for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Cholangiography and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Versus Intraoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Gallbladder and Common Bile Duct Stones: a Meta-Analysis

Is intraoperative cholangiography necessary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis?

Effect of Laparoscopy Combined with Choledochoscope for the Treatment of Cholecystolithiasis and Choledocholithiasis

Management of Choledocholithiasis: Comparison Between Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy

Monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Critical view of safety approach vs. infundibular technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which one is safer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that compared ultrasonic energy and monopolar electrosurgical energy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Routine intraoperative cholangiography during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 196 consecutive patients

Biliary Anatomy Visualization and Surgeon Satisfaction Using Standard Cholangiography versus Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Cholangiography during Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Systematic Review of Utilized Ports in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Pushing the Boundaries

Clinical Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Fiberoptic Choledochoscopy versus Conventional Open Surgery for Gallbladder Stones Complicated with Common Bile Duct Stones

A meta-analysis of single-stage laparoscopiccholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Versus Open Approach in Cirrhotic Patients with Choledocholithiasis: A Retrospective Study.

Ultrasonic versus electrosurgical device for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

The value of selective intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy