An Updated Estimate of Geocenter Variation from Analysis of SLR Data

Minkang Cheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16071189

IF: 5

2024-03-29

Remote Sensing

Abstract:The Earth's center of mass (CM) is defined in satellite orbit dynamics as the center of mass of the entire Earth system, including the solid Earth, oceans, cryosphere, and atmosphere. The CM can be realized using the vector from the origin of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) to the CM, and directly estimated from satellite laser ranging (SLR) data. In previous studies and ITRF translations, SLR observations were assumed to contain only a constant, systematic, station-dependent bias. This treatment leads to a difference of a few mm between the SLR results and other estimates, such as GPS-based global inversions. We show that the difference cannot be attributed to the deficiency of the distribution of SLR tracking stations but is due to the impact of a significant surface-loading-induced seasonal signal captured in the laser range measurement (appearing in station range bias) during the traveling of the laser light pulse. The errors in the modeling of the troposphere zenith delay considerably impact the determination of geocenter motion from SLR data. The SLR-data-derived geocenter motion becomes comparable to the global inversion results when the range biases and thermosphere delay for SLR tracking stations in the SLR network are adjusted as part of the monthly solution.

environmental sciences,imaging science & photographic technology,remote sensing,geosciences, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main issue this paper attempts to address is the discrepancy between the estimated geocenter motion from Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) data and the results estimated from other methods such as the Global Positioning System (GPS). Specifically, the authors point out that this discrepancy cannot simply be attributed to the insufficient distribution of SLR tracking stations, but rather to the significant seasonal signals caused by surface loading captured during the SLR measurement process. Additionally, errors in modeling the tropospheric delay also significantly affect the determination of geocenter motion from SLR data.

To estimate geocenter motion more accurately, the authors propose adjusting the range biases and tropospheric delays of SLR tracking stations in the monthly solutions. With these adjustments, the geocenter motion derived from SLR data becomes comparable to global inversion results. The paper also provides a detailed analysis of the seasonal signals in range biases, tropospheric delays, and horizontal gradients, and evaluates the impact of site displacements caused by higher-order loading.