0978 A Spectrum of Altered Non-rapid Eye Movement Sleep in Schizophrenia
Nataliia Kozhemiako,Chenguang Jiang,Yifan Sun,Zhenglin Guo,Dimitrios Mylonas,Michael Murphy,Wei Zhu,Zhenhe· Zhou,Hailiang Huang,Dara S Manoach,Jun Wang,Mei-Hua· Hall,Jen· Pan,Shaun M · Purcell,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0978
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Multiple facets of sleep neurophysiology, including electroencephalography (EEG) metrics such as non-rapid eye movement (NREM) spindles and slow oscillations (SO), are altered in individuals with schizophrenia (SCZ). However, beyond group-level analyses which treat all patients as a unitary set, the extent to which NREM deficits vary among patients is unclear, as are their relationships to other sources of heterogeneity including clinical factors, illness duration and ageing, cognitive profiles and medication regimens. Methods Using newly collected high-density sleep EEG data on 103 individuals with SCZ and 68 controls, we first sought to replicate our previously reported (Kozhemiako et. al, eLife, 2022) group-level mean differences between patients and controls (original N=130). Then in the combined sample (N=301 including 175 patients), we characterized patient-to-patient variability in NREM neurophysiology. Sleep EEG preprocessing was conducted using an open-source package called Luna (http://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/luna/). Results We replicated all group-level mean differences and confirmed the high accuracy of our predictive model (Area Under the ROC Curve, AUC = 0.93 for diagnosis). Compared to controls, patients showed significantly increased between-individual variability across many (26%) sleep metrics, with patterns only partially recapitulating those for group-level mean differences. Although multiple clinical and cognitive factors were associated with NREM metrics including spindle density, collectively they did not account for much of the general increase in patient-to-patient variability. Medication regime was a greater (albeit still partial) generator of variability, although original group mean differences persisted after controlling for medications. Some sleep metrics including fast spindle density showed exaggerated and accelerated age-related effects in SCZ, and patients exhibited older predicted biological ages based on an independent model of ageing and the sleep EEG. Conclusion We demonstrated robust and replicable alterations in sleep neurophysiology in individuals with SCZ and highlighted distinct patterns of effects contrasting between-group means versus within-group variances. That increased NREM heterogeneity was not explained by traditional clinical or cognitive patient assessments suggests the sleep EEG provides novel, nonredundant information to support the goals of personalized medicine. Collectively, our results point to a spectrum of NREM sleep deficits among SCZ Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology