Abstract:Background: The purpose of this study is to report clinical outcomes, return to activity, redislocation rate, and rate of conversion to arthroplasty for active patients over age 40 undergoing primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. Methods: Patients over 40 years of age who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for shoulder instability between December 2005 and January 2018 with a minimum of 2-year postoperative follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective, monocentric study. Clinical outcome scores including the 12-Item Short-Form Survey, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Single-Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and visual analog scale pain were collected. Additionally, it was determined which patients reached the minimal clinically important difference and the patient-acceptable symptom state for the ASES score. Bivariate analysis was utilized to determine if there was any association between baseline demographic and clinical factors with the outcome scores. Results: Of a total of 814 patients assessed for eligibility, an aggregate of 40 patients were included and 33 patients (8 females) were available for follow-up. The average age was 49.4 ± 7.6 years. At an average follow-up of 7.0 ± 3.6 years, all the outcome scores significantly improved compared to baseline. These included ASES (69.9 ± 19 to 95.8 ± 7.6, P < .001); the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (29.7 ± 17.7 to 3.9 ± 5.4, P < .002); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (53.5 ± 29.3 to 91.6 ± 14.3, P < .003); the 12-Item Short-Form Survey (45.6 ± 8.8 to 55.2 ± 5.7, P < .001); and the visual analog scale (2.1 ± 2.1 to 0.3 ± 1, P < .002). The minimal clinically important difference was reached by 72.7% of the patients and 81.8% reached the patient-acceptable symptom state threshold for the ASES score. Postoperative shoulder stability improved substantially and significantly. Median postoperative satisfaction was 10/10 (range 1-10). Ninety-five-point-six percent of the patients returned to sport, with 91.0% of the patients able to return to preinjury level. One patient (3%) underwent revision surgery for osteoarthritis, in the form of comprehensive arthroscopic management procedure. The presence of cartilage defects cartilage defects Outerbridge grade >2 (P = .020) and posterior labral lesions (P = .03) at index surgery were significantly associated with inferior outcomes in the ASES score. Conclusion: Active patients aged 40 years and older undergoing arthroscopic shoulder stabilization experienced favorable functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 7 years, with low rates of revision surgery or of progression to clinically relevant osteoarthritis. However, the presence of high-grade cartilage lesions and the presence of a posterior labral tear were associated with inferior clinical outcomes.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Stabilization for Posterior Shoulder Instability – A Systematic Review

Subjective and Objective Outcome after Revision Arthroscopic Stabilization for Recurrent Anterior Instability Versus Initial Shoulder Stabilization

Outcomes of primary arthroscopic shoulder stabilization in active patients over 40-results at a mean follow-up of 7 years

Outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent instability are equal to stabilization after a primary event

Arthroscopic Management of Posterior Shoulder Instability

Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Outcomes for Anterior Shoulder Instability

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Conservative Treatment for First-Time Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nonoperative Management of Posterior Shoulder Instability: What Are the Long-Term Clinical Outcomes?

Return to Sport After Arthroscopic Treatment of Posterior Shoulder Instability

Outcomes and Return to Sport and Work After Open Bankart Repair for Recurrent Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review

Clinical Outcomes in Prospective versus Retrospective Studies on Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review

Outcomes for Arthroscopic Repair of Combined Bankart/SLAP Lesions in the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Show No Relevant Change Between 1-Year and 2-Year Follow-Up After Treatment for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review

The External Rotation Immobilisation Does Not Reduce Recurrence Rates or Improve Quality of Life after Primary Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Long-term results of arthroscopic capsulolabral revision repair for failed anterior shoulder instability repair using suture anchors at a minimum of 10 years follow-up

Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic acromioclavicular stabilization for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Arthroscopic Trillat technique for chronic anterior shoulder instability: outcomes at 2 years follow-up in 74 at risk sport-patient

Association of the Stability Ratio with Postoperative Clinical Function and Recurrence of Instability in Patients with Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Long-term Effectiveness and Outcome-Determining Factors of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recreational Sports Population: An Assessment of 100 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 12.7 Years

Mid-term to long-term results of primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a retrospective study

Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Comprehensive Review