P400 Experience with the use of intestinal ultrasound and application of the Milan Ultrasound Criteria in Colombian patients with ulcerative colitis

L V Parra Izquierdo,M Vargas,J Frías-Ordoñez,E Ibañez,S Rios,G Orduz,C Florez-Sarmiento
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0530
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has been reported to be accurate in the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) and can also be applied to determine the extent of the disease, its severity and location of inflammation, also, is fast, effective, non-invasive, relatively inexpensive, and can be performed in health care centres of varying complexity. The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reproducibility of IUS in patients with UC, and evaluate the Milan Ultrasound Criteria (MUC) as a predictor of activity in UC. Methods analytical observational study in adults and paediatric patients with UC with different degrees of activity, and with a need for colonoscopy. Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and ultrasonographic variables were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed. The presence of endoscopically active disease was the outcome (or dependent variable). All IUS parameters described were independent variables. Univariate analysis was used to identify candidate predictors. A significance level of 0.05 was used in all tests. Results Thirty-six subjects were included, predominantly male, 75% (27/36) were in endoscopic remission (Mayo score 0 -1), while 25% (9/36) had endoscopic activity (Mayo endoscopic score > 2). Median Colonic wall thickening (CWT) in patients in endoscopic remission (Mayo score 0-1) was 2.4 (IQR 2-2.8) mm compared to 3.1 (IQR 2.15-4.2) mm in patients with endoscopically active disease (Mayo score 2) with no statistically significant difference p=0.148. Colonic wall flow at power doppler (CWF) was present in 22.2 % (6/27) of patients in endoscopic remission compared to 44.4 % (4/9) of patients showing endoscopic activity (p=0.148). Endoscopic activity (p = 0.264). Loss of elasticity and peristalsis was present in 11.1% (3/27) patients in remission compared to 66.6% (6/9) in patients with activity (p=0.003). As for mesenteric fat hypertrophy, it was found in 44.4% (4/9) of patients with activity compared to 14.8% (4/27) in remission (p=0.098). Enlarged mesenteric nodes were found in 22.2% (2/9) patients with activity compared to 14.8% (4/27) in remission (p=0.615). Free fluid was present in 22.2% (2/9) of patients with activity compared to 7.4% (2/27) in remission (p=0.315). The mean value of the MUC score was 4.025 (observer 1 mean 3.85 with S: 77% and E: 70%, observer 2 mean 3.99, with S: 66% and E: 77%). The degree of interobserver agreement was 0.957. Conclusion IUS is a useful and effective tool in the evaluation of disease activity in patients with UC, with a MUC measurement of 4.025 suggesting an adequate diagnostic performance of this score, being the best cut-off point to discriminate between activity versus remission.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?