Comment on "Pathological complete response, category change, and prognostic significance of HER2-low breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant treatment: a multicenter analysis of 2489 cases"

Tianfei Yu,Changfei Yang,Ming Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02616-8
IF: 9.075
2024-02-21
British Journal of Cancer
Abstract:We read with interest the original paper by Zhu et al. [1], in which they analyzed 2489 breast cancers patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) from 2009 to 2020. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-low status, defined as immunohistochemical (IHC) expression 1+/2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative, was observed in 41.1% of patients. HER2-low patients had higher estrogen receptor (ER) positivity and similar pathological complete response rates compared to HER2-0 patients. However, HER2 status showed low concordance rates. HER2-low patients had better prognosis, especially in ER-positive subset, suggesting the need for re-testing HER2 status post-NAT in the era of anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. We highly appreciate the authors' efforts. Nonetheless, we would like to present our concern about the authors' work when they used Cohen's Kappa statistic to estimate concordance rates of HER2 and other biomarkers. Assessing concordance rate is crucial in research. Kappa statistics serve as essential tools, ensuring consistent ratings among assessors [2]. They quantitatively measure agreement levels, especially important in studies involving categorical data. Categorical data entails distinct value variables, either ordered or unordered. Ordinal variables, like Likert scale responses, possess a clear hierarchy [3], whereas nominal variables, such as colors or gender identities, treat categories equally [4].
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?