CT Prostate Segmentation Based on Synthetic MRI-aided Deep Attention Fully Convolution Network.
Yang Lei,Xue Dong,Zhen Tian,Yingzi Liu,Sibo Tian,Tonghe Wang,Xiaojun Jiang,Pretesh Patel,Ashesh B. Jani,Hui Mao,Walter J. Curran,Tian Liu,Xiaofeng Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13933
2019-01-01
Abstract:PurposeAccurate segmentation of the prostate on computed tomography (CT) for treatment planning is challenging due to CT's poor soft tissue contrast. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to aid prostate delineation, but its final accuracy is limited by MRI‐CT registration errors. We developed a deep attention‐based segmentation strategy on CT‐based synthetic MRI (sMRI) to deal with the CT prostate delineation challenge without MRI acquisition.Methods and materialsWe developed a prostate segmentation strategy which employs an sMRI‐aided deep attention network to accurately segment the prostate on CT. Our method consists of three major steps. First, a cycle generative adversarial network was used to estimate an sMRI from CT images. Second, a deep attention fully convolution network was trained based on sMRI and the prostate contours deformed from MRIs. Attention models were introduced to pay more attention to prostate boundary. The prostate contour for a query patient was obtained by feeding the patient's CT images into the trained sMRI generation model and segmentation model.ResultsThe segmentation technique was validated with a clinical study of 49 patients by leave‐one‐out experiments and validated with an additional 50 patients by hold‐out test. The Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and mean surface distance indices between our segmented and deformed MRI‐defined prostate manual contours were 0.92 ± 0.09, 4.38 ± 4.66, and 0.62 ± 0.89 mm, respectively, with leave‐one‐out experiments, and were 0.91 ± 0.07, 4.57 ± 3.03, and 0.62 ± 0.65 mm, respectively, with hold‐out test.ConclusionsWe have proposed a novel CT‐only prostate segmentation strategy using CT‐based sMRI, and validated its accuracy against the prostate contours that were manually drawn on MRI images and deformed to CT images. This technique could provide accurate prostate volume for treatment planning without requiring MRI acquisition, greatly facilitating the routine clinical workflow.