Classification of the high‐rank syntaxa of the Central and Eastern Balkan dry grasslands with a new hierarchical expert system approach

Kiril Vassilev,Erwin Bergmeier,Steffen Boch,Hristo Pedashenko,Desislava Sopotlieva,Ioannis Tsiripidis,Iva Apostolova,Georgios Fotiadis,Anna Ganeva,Beloslava Genova,Rayna Natcheva,Chrisoula Pirini,Veselin Shivarov,Lubomír Tichý,Michael Vrahnakis,Jürgen Dengler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12779
2024-05-24
Applied Vegetation Science
Abstract:We classified the dry grasslands of the Central and Eastern Balkan Peninsula with a large dataset and a new classification approach, called iterative cluster optimisation for hierarchical expert systems (ICO‐HES). We distinguish and describe 12 alliances, placed in eight orders and four classes, with one alliance and one order new to science. ICO‐HES has great potential also for other classifications as it is hierarchical, leaves very few plots unclassified and unites expert system species and diagnostic species into one concept. Aims Developing a hierarchical classification system for classes, orders and alliances of the diverse dry grasslands of the Central and Eastern Balkan Peninsula and translating this into an electronic expert system (ES) for the automatic assignment of plots. Location Serbia, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Bulgaria and northern Greece. Methods We extracted 5734 plots from the Balkan Dry Grassland Database corresponding to eight classes of dry grasslands reported from the region, using the EuroVegChecklist ES. This data set and later the plots within each derived subunit were subjected to a new numerical approach: starting with an initial partitioning (expert‐interpreted TWINSPAN classification), diagnostic species were determined based on their phi‐values for the target vegetation type and the differences in phi‐values to the next similar types. These diagnostic species were fed into an ES to create a new partitioning, a procedure which was iterated until diagnostic species and species of the ES converged. Then the same approach was applied within each of the derived units to define the units of the next‐lower level. Results The iterative cluster optimisation (ICO) converged in all cases. The resulting hierarchical expert system (HES) classified 95% of all plots to alliances. We distinguished four classes with eight orders and 12 alliances: (1) Tuberarietea guttatae (Romuleion); (2) Stipo‐Brachypodietea distachyi (Clinopodio alpini‐Thymion striati); (3) Festuco‐Brometea with Brachypodietalia pinnati (Chrysopogono‐Danthonion calycinae and Cirsio‐Brachypodion pinnati), Festucetalia valesiacae (Festucion valesiacae), an unnamed order of rocky steppes (with Pimpinello‐Thymion zygioidis) and Koelerietalia splendentis (Centaureo‐Bromion fibrosi, Saturejion montanae and Diantho haematocalycis‐Festucion hirtovaginatae); (four) Koelerio‐Corynephoretea with Sedo acris‐Festucetalia (Festucion vaginatae) and Trifolio arvensis‐Festucetalia ovinae (Armerio rumelicae‐Potentillion and Minuartio montanae‐Poion molinerii all. nov.). Conclusions We created a unified hierarchical classification with an electronic ES using diagnostic species defined by phi‐values. Our new approach (ICO‐HES: iterative cluster optimisation for hierarchical expert systems) allows dividing large data sets into meaningful units at several hierarchical levels, and thus has high potential for complex classifications. Importantly, it overcomes the divide between ES species and diagnostic species and re‐unites them into one concept.
ecology,plant sciences,forestry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?