Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) approach for patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study between four ERCP techniques with proposed management algorithm
Rabih Ghazi,Farah Abdul Razzak,Anthony Kerbage,Vitor Brunaldi,Andrew C Storm,Eric J Vargas,Aliana Bofill-Garcia,Vinay Chandrasekhara,Ryan J Law,John A Martin,Omar M Ghanem,Bret T Petersen,Barham K Abu Dayyeh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.005
Abstract:Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is technically challenging in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to altered anatomy. Objective: To compare the procedural and clinical outcomes of 4 different ERCP techniques in RYGB patients. Setting: Academic tertiary referral center in the United States. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including patients with RYGB anatomy who underwent an ERCP between January 2015 and September 2020. We compared procedural success and adverse events (AEs) rates of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), gastrostomy-assisted ERCP (GAE), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE), and rendezvous guidewire-assisted ERCP (RGA). Results: Seventy-eight RYGB patients underwent a total of 132 ERCPs. The mean age was 60 ± 11.8 years, with female predominance (85.7%). The ERCP procedures performed were BAE (n = 64; 48.5%), GAE (n = 18; 13.7%), EDGE (n = 25; 18.9%), and RGA (n = 25; 18.9%), with overall procedure success rates of 64.1%, 100%, 89.5%, and 91.7%, respectively. All approaches were superior to BAE (GAE versus BAE, P = .003; EDGE versus BAE, P = .034; RGA versus BAE, P = .011). The overall AE rates were 10.9%, 11.1%, 15.8 %, and 25.0%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in AEs. There were also no differences in bleeding, post-ERCP pancreatitis, and perforation rates between the 4 approaches. Conclusion: Procedure success was similar between GAE, RGA, and EDGE, but superior to BAE. AE rates were similar between approaches.