Abstract:Abstract Whole-genome duplication (WGD) occurs broadly and repeatedly across the history of eukaryotes and is recognized as a prominent evolutionary force, especially in plants. Immediately following WGD, most genes are present in two copies as paralogs. Due to this redundancy, one copy of a paralog pair commonly undergoes pseudogenization and is eventually lost. When speciation occurs shortly after WGD; however, differential loss of paralogs may lead to spurious phylogenetic inference resulting from the inclusion of pseudoorthologs–paralogous genes mistakenly identified as orthologs because they are present in single copies within each sampled species. The influence and impact of including pseudoorthologs versus true orthologs as a result of gene extinction (or incomplete laboratory sampling) are only recently gaining empirical attention in the phylogenomics community. Moreover, few studies have yet to investigate this phenomenon in an explicit coalescent framework. Here, using mathematical models, numerous simulated data sets, and two newly assembled empirical data sets, we assess the effect of pseudoorthologs on species tree estimation under varying degrees of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and differential gene loss scenarios following WGD. When gene loss occurs along the terminal branches of the species tree, alignment-based (BPP) and gene-tree-based (ASTRAL, MP-EST, and STAR) coalescent methods are adversely affected as the degree of ILS increases. This can be greatly improved by sampling a sufficiently large number of genes. Under the same circumstances, however, concatenation methods consistently estimate incorrect species trees as the number of genes increases. Additionally, pseudoorthologs can greatly mislead species tree inference when gene loss occurs along the internal branches of the species tree. Here, both coalescent and concatenation methods yield inconsistent results. These results underscore the importance of understanding the influence of pseudoorthologs in the phylogenomics era. [Coalescent method; concatenation method; incomplete lineage sorting; pseudoorthologs; single-copy gene; whole-genome duplication.]

Reconstruction of the evolutionary history of gene gains and losses since the last universal common ancestor

In situ dissecting the evolution of gene duplication with different histone modification patterns based on high-throughput data analysis in <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>

Evolutionary patterns of 64 vertebrate genomes (species) revealed by phylogenomics analysis of protein-coding gene families

Characterization and Inference of Gene Gain/Loss along Evolutionary History

The Theory of Gene Family Histories

Counting and sampling gene family evolutionary histories in the duplication-loss and duplication-loss-transfer models

Species Tree Estimation and the Impact of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication

Origin of New Genes: Evidence from Experimental and Computational Analyses

[Comparative Analysis of Gene Family Size Provides Insight into the Adaptive Evolution of Vertebrates].

Inferring Gene Family Histories in Yeast Identifies Lineage Specific Expansions

Ab Initio Construction and Evolutionary Analysis of Protein-Coding Gene Families with Partially Homologous Relationships: Closely Related Drosophila Genomes As a Case Study

Reconstruction of Ancestral Genomes as a Key to Understanding the Early Evolution of Vertebrate Genotype

Characterization and inference of gene gain/loss along burkholderia evolutionary history.

Evolutionary diversification of ancestral genes across vertebrates and insects

Reconstruction of Ancestral Gene Order after Segmental Duplication and Gene Loss

Reconstruction of Ancestral Gene Order Following Large Scale Genome Duplication and Gene Loss

Macroevolutionary dynamics of gene family gain and loss along multicellular eukaryotic lineages

Reconstructing ancestral gene content by coevolution.

Reconstruction of the deep history of "Parent-Daughter" relationships among vertebrate paralogs

Determining the evolutionary history of gene families

Reconstruction of hundreds of reference ancestral genomes across the eukaryotic kingdom