Abstract:Sustainability is a key driver of innovation for products, services, and business models. Sustainability innovations are aimed at improving the environmental, social, and economic performance of the innovated solution. Given the complexity of many sustainability challenges, leading innovators may seek to boost their innovation capacity by tapping into the ideas, knowledge, and expertise of their stakeholders. In doing so they need to consider how many and which stakeholders to integrate into new product development (NPD) processes, and at what stage. This study investigates stakeholder integration strategies associated with high sustainability performance of innovation. Building on the literatures of sustainability innovation and stakeholder integration in the context of NPD, this study developed a configurational model to analyze stakeholder integration strategies. The empirical data consisted of 80 interviews and documents from 13 medium to large companies and their stakeholders in Europe. Using the fsQCA method, it was found that there is not just one effective strategy but three stakeholder integration strategies for high sustainability performance of innovation. The results imply that deep organizational engagement with stakeholders is necessary for the achievement of high performance. Otherwise, the three strategies range from progressive openness, which allows stakeholders to exert a fundamental influence on the sustainability innovation, to limited openness toward stakeholder integration. With the early secondary strategy pointing to progressive openness , companies integrate secondary stakeholders early on and so maximize the influence of different views on the innovation. As to limited openness, companies following the selective strategy limit the number of stakeholder groups in NPD but are indifferent to the timing of these groups’ inputs. Finally, the fine‐tuning strategy is least open to atypical views as it restricts the share of secondary stakeholders and only allows external inputs after the fuzzy front end phase when key decisions regarding the innovation have been made.

Challenges in modelling and measuring sustainability competencies crucial to successful sustainability transitions

Promoting sustainability competency and self-efficacy in class teacher education

The limits to sustainability: views and tensions expressed by future leaders for change

Competencies of Sustainability Professionals: An Empirical Study on Key Competencies for Sustainability

Measuring Social Dimensions of Sustainability at the Community Level: An Illustrative but Cautionary Tale

An Exploration of Sustainability Competency Framework Design and Talent Cultivation Strategies

Resilient Sustainability Assessment Framework from a Transdisciplinary System-of-Systems Perspective

Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework

Assessing sustainability competencies in contemporary STEM higher education: a data-driven analysis at Tecnologico de Monterrey

Toward a Validated Competence Framework for Sustainable Entrepreneurship

Becoming Self-Aware—How Do Self-Awareness and Transformative Learning Fit in the Sustainability Competency Discourse?

Mapping mental models in sustainability transitions

Experimenting with sustainability education: the case of a student-driven campus initiative in Finland

Competence in Unsustainability Resolution—A New Paradigm

How Does Sustainability Become Professionally Relevant? Exploring the Role of Sustainability Conceptions in First Year Students

Exploring Student Engagement in Sustainability Education and Study Abroad

Advancing Urban Sustainability Transitions: A Framework for Understanding Urban Complexity and Enhancing Integrative Transformations

Why Corporate Sustainability is Not Yet Measured

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Test Sustainable Development in University 4.0 in the Ultra-Smart Society Era

Strategies for Integrating Stakeholders into Sustainability Innovation: A Configurational Perspective

Fostering teachers as sustainability and climate change educators through understanding of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs