A randomized control trial of occupational performance coaching for adults with multiple sclerosis

Dorothy Kessler,Martina Franz,Niloufar Malakouti,Roshanth Rajachandrakumar,Moogeh Baharnoori,Marcia Finlayson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.022

IF: 4.06

2024-06-07

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract:Objective To determine if the receipt of occupational performance coaching (OPC) by adults living with multiple sclerosis (MS) improves participants' satisfaction with performance in daily activities (primary outcome) and improves perceived performance in daily activities, resilience, autonomy and participation, and reduces illness intrusiveness and multiple sclerosis impact (secondary outcomes). Design Two-group randomized clinical trial with a waitlist control. Setting Community. Participants Convenience sample of adults with MS were recruited through a research registry. Eighty-three individuals were approached, 35 were assessed for eligibility and 31 were enrolled and completed baseline assessment. Participants were English speaking, without serious cognitive impairment or severe depression, and were not receiving other coaching interventions. Intervention Six telephone sessions of OPC were delivered by a trained facilitator over 10 weeks. Initial sessions focused on goal setting, prioritization, and action planning. Subsequent sessions involved goal and action plan review, discussion of facilitators and barriers, and goal and plan refinement. Main Outcome Measure(s) Primary outcome was participants' satisfaction with performance in daily activities, as measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Secondary outcome measures included the COPM performance rating, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire, Adapted Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale, and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale. Measures were administered by a blinded assessor at baseline, 10 weeks, and 2 months. Results Participants in the intervention and waitlist control groups were equivalent on demographic and outcome measures at baseline. At 10 weeks, the intervention group had significantly higher COPM ratings for both satisfaction (p< 0.001) and performance (p=0.002). No other outcomes were significantly different. For the intervention group, the benefits of OPC were maintained at 2 months. Conclusion(s) OPC led to improved satisfaction with performance and performance in daily activities. Future research with a larger sample is needed to determine other impacts and who benefits most from OPC.

rehabilitation,sport sciences