Effect of Processing Routes on Microstructural Development, Mechanical Properties, and Wear Behavior of Ti6Al4V Alloy
Parastoo Maghazei,Khalil Ranjbar,Javid Naseri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09240-w
IF: 2.3
2024-02-21
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
Abstract:Various processing methods were used to prepare the Ti6Al4V alloy, including vacuum suction casting (VSC), selective laser melting (SLM), spark plasma sintering with powder (SPS-P), and a combination of SLM and SPS (SLMed–SPS). The VSC and SLM methods melt and solidify samples at high cooling rates, while the SPS-P and SLM–SPS methods consolidate powder samples at 850 °C in a solid state and cool them in an SPS furnace. The microstructure, compressive strength, hardness, and wear behavior of each method were analyzed. The processing route has a significant impact on the mechanical properties and microstructure due to the different heating cycles involved. The high cooling rate associated with VSC and SLM resulted in a dominant α ′-martensite phase, while the SPS-P and SLM–SPS routes were characterized by lamellar α and β -phases as a result of α′ -martensite phase dissociation below the β -transus temperature during the SPS thermal cycle. SLMed samples exhibited defects such as porosity and unmelted particles, but after SPS, no defects were apparent. The matrix of SPS-P samples contained about 1.7% retained fine pores. Microstructural analysis revealed that SPS is an effective post-treatment process for eliminating SLM defects. The VSC and SLM samples exhibited a maximum compressive yield strength of 1200 and 1150 MPa, respectively, while a minimum yield of 840 MPa was achieved in the SPS-P samples, followed by approximately 800 MPa in the SLM–SPS samples. A similar trend was observed in the samples' hardness and wear behavior. All samples were found to undergo mild abrasion, assisted initially by adhesive wear.
materials science, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?