A study on water quality parameters estimation for urban rivers based on ground hyperspectral remote sensing technology
Yikai Hou,Anbing Zhang,Rulan Lv,Song Zhao,Jie Ma,Hai Zhang,Ziang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20293-z
IF: 5.8
2022-04-23
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Abstract:<p class="a-plus-plus">The purpose of this research is to seek a better inversion algorithm. And on this basis, it explores the feasibility of using hyperspectral monitoring technology instead of laboratory physical and chemical index test and evaluates the prediction effect of inversion model on water quality change. So as to be more convenient, more economical and extensive monitoring methods for water quality monitoring of urban internal river are provided. This paper takes the water samples collected in Fuyang River in downtown Handan as the research object and obtains original spectral data of the samples by the ASD FieldSpec 4 field hyperspectral spectrometer. After the smoothing filter pretreatment by the Savitzky-Golay (SG) method and specified mathematical transformations, the modeling spectral indicators of various water quality parameters are selected and determined by calculating the maximum mean of absolute values for correlation coefficients of various spectral indicators and measured values in the wavelength range from 400 to 950 nm. By introducing partial least squares (PLS), random forest (RF), and Lasso (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator), six water quality parameter fitting models were constructed including turbidity (Turb), suspended substance (SS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), NH4-N, total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP), which are also testified and evaluated through hyperspectral data. The results show that different spectral transformation methods highlight different information inversion effects. The first derivative of reciprocal logarithm of spectral data after SG smoothing has a good modeling effect on four water quality parameters including Turb, COD, NH<sub class="a-plus-plus">4</sub>-N, and TP; and the first derivative of smoothed spectral data has a good modeling effect on both water quality parameters of SS and TN. Among the three models, the PLS model has a good prediction effect, with the <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq1"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.823ex" height="3.509ex" style="vertical-align: -1.171ex;" viewBox="0 -1006.6 1215.5 1510.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-52" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="1074" y="581"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMATHI-70" x="1074" y="-350"></use></g></svg></span></span></span> for COD, TN, and TP ranging from 0.74 to 0.80, while that for Turb and SS shows relatively poorer prediction effect, followed by even worse effect on HN<sub class="a-plus-plus">4</sub>-H. Both machine learning algorithms of RF and Lasso have respectively obtained the best prediction models for different water quality parameters. The Lasso model has a <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq2"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.823ex" height="3.509ex" style="vertical-align: -1.171ex;" viewBox="0 -1006.6 1215.5 1510.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-52" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="1074" y="581"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMATHI-70" x="1074" y="-350"></use></g></svg></span></span></span> value above 0.8 for water body organic pollutants COD, TN, and TP, and the decrease value for <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq3"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.818ex" height="3.176ex" style="vertical-align: -0.838ex;" viewBox="0 -1006.6 1213.4 1367.4" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-52" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="1074" y="581"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMATHI-63" x="1074" y="-350"></use></g></svg></span></span></span> and <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq4"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.823ex" height="3.509ex" style="vertical-align: -1.171ex;" viewBox="0 -1006.6 1215.5 1510.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-52" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="1074" y="581"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMATHI-70" x="1074" y="-350"></use></g></svg></span></span></span> is below 0.1, which indicates that the model has high prediction accuracy and strong generalization ability, but the results of SS and NH<sub class="a-plus-plus">4</sub>-N do not meet the expected accuracy. In the inversion model of RF for COD, <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq5"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.823ex" height="3.509ex" style="vertical-align: -1.171ex;" viewBox="0 -1006.6 1215.5 1510.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-52" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="1074" y="581"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMATHI-70" x="1074" y="-350"></use></g></svg></span></span></span> is higher than <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq6"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.818ex" height="3.176ex" style="vertical-align: -0.838ex;" viewBox="0 -1006.6 1213.4 1367.4" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-52" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="1074" y="581"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMATHI-63" x="1074" y="-350"></use></g></svg></span></span></span>, which shows excellent performance, and has certain prediction ability for SS and NH<sub class="a-plus-plus">4</sub>-N. The RF model and Lasso model complement each other effectively in applicability and prediction accuracy. Compared with the traditional regression model PLS, machine learning has obvious overall advantages, making it more suitable for classified inversion prediction of urban river water quality parameters.</p><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-52" d="M230 637Q203 637 198 638T193 649Q193 676 204 682Q206 683 378 683Q550 682 564 680Q620 672 658 652T712 606T733 563T739 529Q739 484 710 445T643 385T576 351T538 338L545 333Q612 295 612 223Q612 212 607 162T602 80V71Q602 53 603 43T614 25T640 16Q668 16 686 38T712 85Q717 99 720 102T735 105Q755 105 755 93Q755 75 731 36Q693 -21 641 -21H632Q571 -21 531 4T487 82Q487 109 502 166T517 239Q517 290 474 313Q459 320 449 321T378 323H309L277 193Q244 61 244 59Q244 55 245 54T252 50T269 48T302 46H333Q339 38 339 37T336 19Q332 6 326 0H311Q275 2 180 2Q146 2 117 2T71 2T50 1Q33 1 33 10Q33 12 36 24Q41 43 46 45Q50 46 61 46H67Q94 46 127 49Q141 52 146 61Q149 65 218 339T287 628Q287 635 230 637ZM630 554Q630 586 609 608T523 636Q521 636 500 636T462 637H440Q393 637 386 627Q385 624 352 494T319 361Q319 360 388 360Q466 361 492 367Q556 377 592 426Q608 449 619 486T630 554Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-70" d="M23 287Q24 290 25 295T30 317T40 348T55 381T75 411T101 433T134 442Q209 442 230 378L240 387Q302 442 358 442Q423 442 460 395T497 281Q497 173 421 82T249 -10Q227 -10 210 -4Q199 1 187 11T168 28L161 36Q160 35 139 -51T118 -138Q118 -144 126 -145T163 -148H188Q194 -155 194 -157T191 -175Q188 -187 185 -190T172 -194Q170 -194 161 -194T127 -193T65 -192Q-5 -192 -24 -194H-32Q-39 -187 -39 -183Q-37 -156 -26 -148H-6Q28 -147 33 -136Q36 -130 94 103T155 350Q156 355 156 364Q156 405 131 405Q109 405 94 377T71 316T59 280Q57 278 43 278H29Q23 284 23 287ZM178 102Q200 26 252 26Q282 26 310 49T356 107Q374 141 392 215T411 325V331Q411 405 350 405Q339 405 328 402T306 393T286 380T269 365T254 350T243 336T235 326L232 322Q232 321 229 308T218 264T204 212Q178 106 178 102Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-63" d="M34 159Q34 268 120 355T306 442Q362 442 394 418T427 355Q427 326 408 306T360 285Q341 285 330 295T319 325T330 359T352 380T366 386H367Q367 388 361 392T340 400T306 404Q276 404 249 390Q228 381 206 359Q162 315 142 235T121 119Q121 73 147 50Q169 26 205 26H209Q321 26 394 111Q403 121 406 121Q410 121 419 112T429 98T420 83T391 55T346 25T282 0T202 -11Q127 -11 81 37T34 159Z"></path></defs></svg>
environmental sciences