Associations between PM1 exposure and daily emergency department visits in 19 hospitals, Beijing

Hao Wang,Feng Lu,Moning Guo,Wenhong Fan,Wei Ji,Zhaomin Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142507
2021-02-01
Abstract:<p>Although the adverse health effects caused by PM<sub>2.5</sub> (particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter &lt;2.5 μm) and PM<sub>10</sub> (PM with an aerodynamic diameter &lt;10 μm) have been examined in numeric studies, far less scientific evidence is available for PM with an aerodynamic diameter &lt;1 μm (PM<sub>1</sub>). We performed a time series analysis to elucidate the associations between PM<sub>1</sub> exposure and emergency department visits (EDVs) in 19 hospitals within Beijing. During the study period from January 2016 to December 2017, the average PM<sub>1</sub> (mean ± standard deviation) was determined to be 39 ± 39 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, which was approximately 36% lower than that of 61 ± 56 μg/m<sup>3</sup> for PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Results based on meta-analysis suggest that non-accidental and respiratory EDVs increased by 0.47% (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.35, 0.59%) and 0.59% (95%CI: 0.38, 0.8%) per 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> uptick in PM<sub>1</sub> exposure. By comparison, the magnitude downgraded to 0.27% (95%CI: 0.15, 0.39%) in non-accidental and 0.32% (95%CI: 0.18, 0.47%) in respiratory EDVs for PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure, indicating that PMs of a smaller size may be a higher risk factor for EDVs. No significant differences in PM-associated EDV effects were noted between males and females, while stratified analysis by age and season illustrated that stronger effects were found for a warm season and young population. Our analysis reinforces the notion that PM<sub>1</sub> exhibited a higher risk for EDVs, suggesting more efforts may be required to mitigate PM<sub>1</sub> pollution.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?