OP38 Should all patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel diseases be screened for metabolic bone disease? Results from a Danish population-based inception cohort study

M Attauabi,G Roager Madsen,F Bendtsen,J Seidelin,J Burisch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0038
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), are associated with an increased risk of metabolic bone diseases (MBD). The aim of the current study was to evaluate for the occurrence of MBD in which all patients with newly diagnosed IBD are offered a Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. Secondly, we aimed to identify risk factors for development of MBD. Methods All adult patients with newly diagnosed IBD within a catchment area corresponding to ~20% of the Danish population have since May 2021 been enrolled in an ongoing prospective population-based inception cohort, IBD Prognosis Study. Herein, all participants were, as part of the initial work-up, invited to a DXA scan at IBD diagnosis. A T-score< −2.5 standard deviations (SD) was diagnostic for osteoporosis, while a T-score between –1 and –2.5 defined osteopenia. Multivariate analyses adjusted findings for age, gender, and medication differences. Results A total of 316 patients with newly diagnosed IBD (UC: 178, CD: 117, unclassified IBD (IBDU): 21) received a DXA scan within 90 days (interquartile range (IQR) 51-139 days). Baseline characteristics of the population were similar to those previously described for newly diagnosed IBD. In total, 48 (27%, females (F): 26%, males (M): 28%) and 17 (10%, F: 14%, M: 5%) patients with UC were found to have osteopenia and osteoporosis, resp. The corresponding numbers for CD were 23 (20%, F: 15%, M: 24%) and nine (8%, F: 7%, M: 9%). Subgroup analysis showed a high occurrence of osteopenia in both UC and CD regardless of age group (Table 1). No difference between UC and CD was observed in terms of the risk of osteopenia (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-3.60) or osteoporosis (OR=1.42 (95% CI 0.53-4.08)). Low albumin level (<36 g/L) was the only factor associated with osteopenia in patients with UC (aOR=2.57 (95% CI 1.05-6.53). In patients with CD, no risk factors were identified. However, the risk of osteoporosis was independently associated with age higher than 65 years in both UC (aOR=13.4 (95% CI 3.78-51.36)) and CD (aOR=6.39 (95% CI 1.09-35.47)), while female gender was not relevant (UC: aOR=2.63 (95% CI 0.75-10.98), CD: (aOR=0.47 (95% CI 0.08-2.20)). Finally, the risk of MBD was not associated with IBD phenotype, medications, or patient-reported or endoscopic severity. Conclusion To our knowledge, the current study is the first evaluation of DXA scans as a screening tool for patients with newly diagnosed IBD in a population-based setting. We found a high incidence of osteopenia affecting every fourth patient at IBD diagnosis. These findings are concerning given the high risk of repeated need for systemic steroids in this patient population.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?