Abstract:The generalized Riemann problem (GRP) scheme for the Euler equations and gas-kinetic scheme (GKS) for the Boltzmann equation are two high resolution shock capturing schemes for fluid simulations. The difference is that one is based on the characteristics of the inviscid Euler equations and their wave interactions, and the other is based on the particle transport and collisions. The similarity between them is that both methods can use identical MUSCL-type initial reconstructions around a cell interface, and the spatial slopes on both sides of a cell interface involve in the gas evolution process and the construction of a time-dependent flux function. Although both methods have been applied successfully to the inviscid compressible flow computations, their performances have never been compared. Since both methods use the same initial reconstruction, any difference is solely coming from different underlying mechanism in their flux evaluation. Therefore, such a comparison is important to help us to understand the correspondence between physical modeling and numerical performances. Since GRP is so faithfully solving the inviscid Euler equations, the comparison can be also used to show the validity of solving the Euler equations itself. The numerical comparison shows that the GRP exhibits a slightly better computational efficiency, and has comparable accuracy with GKS for the Euler solutions in 1D case, but the GKS is more robust than GRP. For the 2D high Mach number flow simulations, the GKS is absent from the shock instability and converges to the steady state solutions faster than the GRP. The GRP has carbuncle phenomena, likes a cloud hanging over exact Riemann solvers. The GRP and GKS use different physical processes to describe the flow motion starting from a discontinuity. One is based on the assumption of equilibrium state with infinite number of particle collisions, and the other starts from the non-equilibrium free transport process to evolve into an equilibrium one through particle collisions. The different mechanism in the flux evaluation deviates their numerical performance. Through this study, we may conclude scientifically that it may NOT be valid to use the Euler equations as governing equations to construct numerical fluxes in a discretized space with limited cell resolution. To adapt the Navier–Stokes (NS) equations is NOT valid either because the NS equations describe the flow behavior on the hydrodynamic scale and have no any corresponding physics starting from a discontinuity. This fact alludes to the consistency of the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations with the continuum assumption and the necessity of a direct modeling of the physical process in the discretized space in the construction of numerical scheme when modeling very high Mach number flows. The development of numerical algorithm is similar to the modeling process in deriving the governing equations, but the control volume here cannot be shrunk to zero.

Computation of Unsteady Swirling Flows in Nozzles and Pipes by Applying a New Locally Implicit Godunov-Type Scheme

Numerical Study on Several Godunov-type Schemes with ALE Formulation

Numerical Simulation of Incompressible Interfacial Flows by a Level Set Re-Distancing Method with Improved Mass Conservation

An Implicit Centered Scheme for Steady and Unsteady Incompressible One and Two-Phase Flows

Global entropy solutions to the compressible Euler equations in the isentropic nozzle flow for large data: Application of the modified Godunov scheme and the generalized invariant regions

Three-dimensional Third-Order Gas-Kinetic Scheme on Hybrid Unstructured Meshes for Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations

Scheme for Calculating Unsteady Flows of Heat-Conducting Gas in the Three-Temperature Approximation

A high‐order compact scheme for solving the 2D steady incompressible Navier‐Stokes equations in general curvilinear coordinates

Discrete Unified Gas Kinetic Scheme for All Knudsen Number Flows. II. Thermal Compressible Case.

A conservative implicit scheme for three-dimensional steady flows of diatomic gases in all flow regimes using unstructured meshes in the physical and velocity spaces

A gas-kinetic theory based multidimensional high-order method for the compressible Navier–Stokes solutions

A High-order Gas-Kinetic Navier-Stokes Solver I: One-dimensional Flux Evaluation

Implicit high-order gas-kinetic schemes for compressible flows on three-dimensional unstructured meshes I: Steady flows

Gas-kinetic Scheme with Discontinuous Derivative for Low Speed Flow Computation

A high-order gas-kinetic Navier–Stokes flow solver

Performance of high-order Godunov-type methods in simulations of astrophysical low Mach number flows

High-resolution Finite Difference Schemes Using Curvilinear Coordinate Grids for DNS of Compressible Turbulent Flow over Wavy Walls

An implicit adaptive unified gas-kinetic scheme for steady-state solutions of non-equilibrium flows

Comparison of the Generalized Riemann Solver and the Gas-Kinetic Scheme for Inviscid Compressible Flow Simulations

Numerical methods for 3-D unsteady viscous flow and their applications