Predicting End-of-Life in a Hospital Setting
Gezy Giwangkancana,Heni Anina,Hadyana Sukandar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s443425
2024-02-10
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Gezy Weita Giwangkancana, 1 Heni Nur Anina, 2 Hadyana Sukandar 3 1 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran /Dr. Hasan Sadikin National Referral and Teaching Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia; 2 Department of Nursing Dr. Hasan Sadikin National Referral and Teaching Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia; 3 Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia Correspondence: Heni Nur Anina, Palliative Care Team, Dr. Hasan Sadikin National Referral and Teaching Hospital, RSUP Dr Hasan Sadikin, Bandung, Pasteur Street No. 38, Bandung, 40161, Indonesia, Tel +6281546562490, Email Background: The ability to predict the prognosis of a disease and anticipate death is valuable for patients and families especially in an acute care setting for chronically ill patient. Multiple scoring systems are used to measure disease progression and predict hospital mortality in patients with life-threatening illnesses, taking into account acute conditions, catastrophic events, and slow decline. Aim: Our primary aim is to assess palliative performance score (PPS), early warning score (EWS) and local rumah sakit Dr Hasan Sadikin (RSHS) score to predict 14 days in-hospital mortality. Methods: This was a single-center prospective cohort study from November 2022 to April 2023. Patients with World Health Organization category of terminal illnesses were scored using PPS, EWS and RSHS score and were followed up for 14 days in hospital. Multivariate analysis were conducted and The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used. Results: A multivariable model was calculated using Cox regression. The final model results indicate that EWS (HR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1– 7.7) and a decrease in consciousness (HR: 3.6, 95% CI: 1.2– 10.22) were statistically significant in predicting mortality. Discussions: Most patient in the cohort that died had cancer and were admitted in the previous 6 months. Relying solely on single prediction may not provide enough accuracy, within a 14-day timeframe. Therefore, the results of multivariate analysis were not statistically significant due to Several factors contribute to the complexity of this prediction challenge. As a multifaceted disease with varying stages, treatments, and outcomes, cancer presents a diverse landscape of patient experiences. Conclusion: EWS and decreased consciousness are significant predictors of in-hospital mortality. It is crucial in clinical setting to use multiple indicators to predict death and improve patient care. Keywords: accreditation, care op patient, continuity of care, end of life, hospice, palliative care Monitoring in-hospital mortality is essential to ensuring quality care in healthcare and hospital settings. It is a crucial indicator of the effectiveness of high-level processes in these settings. As such, keeping a close eye on in-hospital mortality rates is essential to ensure patients receive the best care possible. 1–3 Although many diseases can be prevented, mortality and disability are often inevitable, especially as people age and face chronic illnesses defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), such as cardiovascular, lung, and renal diseases, cancer, AIDS, and neurodegenerative diseases like multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, stroke, epilepsy, and brain tumors. Therefore, palliative and end-of-life care have become standard, monitored, and accredited in hospital care. 3–6 One of the main challenges in end-of-life care is identifying which patients are approaching the end of their lives. Another challenge is predicting how long the patient will live in the hospital setting, whether days or weeks. The ability to predict the prognosis of a disease and anticipate death is valuable for patients and families. It allows for a focus on patient comfort and well-being and preparation for a peaceful death. 4,5 Health professionals benefit from making informed decisions and discussing treatment choices, including withholding combative treatment and care goals. There is a discussion about the cost-efficiency impact of palliative and end-of-life services in healthcare, as these patients often require more emergency services and advanced technologies, leading to social inequality. 2,6 In developing countries, especially Muslim countries, there is a complex relationship between death, family devotion, and religious beliefs. Therefore, even in the face of incurable diseases, families still "wait for a miracle", making palliative and end-of-life care slow to develop in these regions. 7–9 Providing an objective, data-drive -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services