Prognostic value of left ventricular systolic function before vascular surgery: a systematic review

Ammar Zaka,Daud Mutahar,Kreyen Ponen,Johayer Abtahi,Naim Mridha,Aman B. Williams,Mohammed Kamali,Joshua G. Kovoor,Stephen Bacchi,Aashray K. Gupta,Peter J. Psaltis,Venu Bhamidipaty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.18866
IF: 1.7
2024-02-04
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Abstract:This systematic review evaluates the prognostic value of left ventricular systolic function measured by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on resting echocardiography, prior to vascular surgery. The research encompassed 10 observational studies comprising 4872 vascular surgery patients. Available data indicates a trend towards increased post‐operative risks, such as all‐cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), in patients with a pre‐operative LVEF of less than 50%. However, the currently available evidence is deemed inconclusive, indicating a need for larger, prospective studies. Background Vascular surgery carries a high risk of post‐operative cardiac complications. Recent studies have shown an association between asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This systematic review aims to evaluate the prognostic value of left ventricular function as determined by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by resting echocardiography before vascular surgery. Methods This review conformed to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. PubMed, OVID Medline and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 27 October 2022. Eligible studies assessed vascular surgery patients, with multivariable‐adjusted or propensity‐matched observational studies measuring LVEF via resting echocardiography and providing risk estimates for outcomes. The primary outcomes measures were all‐cause mortality and congestive heart failure at 30 days. Secondary outcome included the composite outcome MACE. Results Ten observational studies were included (4872 vascular surgery patients). Studies varied widely in degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, symptom status, and outcome reporting, precluding reliable meta‐analysis. Available data demonstrated a trend towards increased incidence of all‐cause mortality, congestive heart failure and MACE in patients with pre‐operative LVEF <50%. Methodological quality of the included studies was found to be of moderate quality according to the Newcastle Ottawa Checklist. Conclusion The evidence surrounding the prognostic value of LVEF measurement before vascular surgery is currently weak and inconclusive. Larger scale, prospective studies are required to further refine cardiac risk prediction before vascular surgery.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?