Abstract:Introduction: With the success of uncemented fixation in younger patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and the growing demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a younger cohort of patients, there has been an increasing interest in cementless tibial baseplate fixation. We sought to determine whether there was a clear advantage to the use of three different forms of tibial baseplate fixation. The primary outcome of this study was survivorship and secondary outcomes were functional and radiological outcomes, up until 10 years. Materials and methods: We conducted a randomised controlled trial and recruited 224 patients with 274 knees. Patients underwent TKA by a single surgeon utilising a standard surgical technique. All patients received a cruciate retaining TKA with a cementless femoral component, and were randomised to receive either a cemented tibial component, a pegged porous coated cementless tibial component with screws or a cementless tantalum monoblock tibial component with pegs. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), radiological data and survivorship were assessed until 10 years post-operatively. Results: Pre-operative range of motion, alignment and PROMS were similar between the three groups. The use of cemented, cementless with screws or cementless with pegs fixation options, lead to differences in functional outcomes. There was greater improvement in the Oxford score and Knee Society Score in patients who received a cemented baseplate compared to tantalum and the pegged porous groups. However, radiological and survival outcomes were similar in all three groups. Overall survivorship was 99.6%, with one knee with cementless tibial fixation and screws revised for subsidence at 3 years. There were no cases of venous thromboembolism, periprosthetic fracture or infection. Conclusions: Irrespective of tibial fixation method, functional and radiological outcomes remain similar at follow-up at 10 years, with no clear difference in outcome between each group. Each method of fixation also had excellent survivorship over this period and should reassure surgeons that whichever method of fixation they choose, long-term outcomes are likely to be satisfactory.

Metal-backed or all-poly tibial components: which are better for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A propensity-score-matching retrospective study at the 5-year follow-up

Mid-term outcomes of medial metal backed and all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in obese patients: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis

All-Polyethylene Tibial Component in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Offers Excellent Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes at Short-Term Follow-Up: A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Study

Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia Vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults with Isolated Medial Osteoarthritis: A Matched Study Protocol.

Metal-backed Versus All-Polyethylene Tibial Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?

Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study

A morphometric medial compartment-specific unicompartmental knee system: 5 years follow up results from a pilot center

Comparison of survival between cemented vs cementless unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a case control study with propensity score matching

Metal-backed Patella Implants in Knee Arthroplasty: Can the Past Predict the Future?

Does Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Offer Improved Clinical Advantages Over Total Knee Replacement in the Treatment of Isolated Lateral Osteoarthritis? A Matched Cohort Analysis From an Independent Center

Long-term outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Survivorship of medial versus lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Outcomes of fixed versus mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Biomechanical comparison of all-polyethylene total knee replacement and its metal-backed equivalent on periprosthetic tibia using the finite element method

Cementless and Cemented Dual-Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Comparison With a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up

No difference in Oxford Knee Score between medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty after two years of follow-up: a clinical trial

Promising Short-Term Outcomes of 145 Cases

The effect of tibial component rotational alignment on clinical outcomes of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Superior Femoral Component Alignment Can Be Achieved with Oxford Microplasty Instrumentation after Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

A prospective randomised controlled trial of cemented and uncemented tibial baseplates: functional and radiological outcomes