Abstract:Background: Advances in health equity rely on representation of diverse groups in population health research samples. Despite progress in the diversification of research samples, continued expansion to include systematically excluded groups is needed to address health inequities. One such group that is infrequently represented in population health research are adults with intellectual disability. Individuals with intellectual disability experience pervasive health disparities. Representation in population health research is crucial to determine the root causes of inequity, understand the health of diverse populations, and address health disparities. The purpose of this paper was to develop recommendations for researchers to increase the accessibility of university health research and to support the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as participants in health research. Methods: A comprehensive literature review, consultation with the university ethics review board, and review of United States federal regulations was completed to identify barriers to research participation for individuals with intellectual disability. A collaborative stakeholder working group developed recommendations and products to increase the accessibility of university research for participants with intellectual disability. Results: Eleven key barriers to research participation were identified including gaps in researchers' knowledge, lack of trust, accessibility and communication challenges, and systematic exclusion among others. Together the stakeholder working group compiled seven general recommendations for university health researchers to guide inclusion efforts. Recommendations included: 1) address the knowledge gap, 2) build community partnerships, 3) use plain language, 4) simplify consent and assent processes, 5) establish research capacity to consent, 6) offer universal supports and accommodations, and 7) practice accessible dissemination. In addition, four products were created as part of the stakeholder working group to be shared with researchers to support the inclusion of participants with intellectual disability. 1) Supports I Need Checklist, 2) Plain language glossary of health and research terms, 3) Understanding Consent and Assent in Plain Language, 4) Easy-Read Paper Template. Conclusion: Community members and individuals with intellectual disability want to be included in research and are eager to engage as research participants. It is the responsibility of the researcher to open the door to university health research. The recommendations discussed in this paper could increase accessibility for a broader range of research participants and, in particular, promote the inclusion of individuals with intellectual disability to advance health equity in population health research.

A Research Agenda to Support Families of People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities With Intersectional Identities

An Equity-Based Research Agenda to Promote Social Inclusion and Belonging for People With IDD

Housing and Long-Term Services and Supports for People With Intellectual or Developmental Disabilities From Racially and Culturally Minoritized Communities

Toward Equity in Research on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Criminal Justice and People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Advancing Health Policy and Outcomes for People With Intellectual or Developmental Disabilities: A Community-Led Agenda

Stress and Resilience Among Families Caring for Children with Intellectual Disability: Expanding the Research Agenda

Family Support and Disability Policies: Perspectives of Siblings of People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Improving Data Infrastructure for Person-Centered Outcomes Research on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Community Conversations: Stakeholder-Identified Research Priorities to Foster Community Participation for Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disability

Direct Support Professionals: Diversity, Disparities, and Deepening Crisis

Disrupting the Family Stress-Proximal Process: A Scoping Review of Interventions for Children with Incarcerated Parents

Equal Ground: Meaningful Collaboration with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Families of Children with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities

Reflections on How What We Say, Do, and Acknowledge as Intellectual and Developmental Disability Researchers Matters

The State of Employment for People With IDD: Implications for Practice, Policy, and Equity

Family based social capital of adults with mild intellectual disabilities supported in 24‐hour residential settings compared to outreach settings

A special section: Contributions of family science to anti‐racism efforts

Making Autism Research Inclusive by Attending to Intersectionality: a Review of the Research Ethics Literature

Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability

Social Capital and People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Examining Family Testimonials for the Reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act