Abstract:Optical full-field measurement methods such as Digital Image Correlation (DIC) are currently extensively applied to study the deformation characteristics of a wide range of materials. The measured displacement and strain fields, however, should always be interpreted in view of the obtained resolution (noise floor) and spatial resolution. Indeed, local (or subset-based) approaches heavily rely on the adopted regularization settings (subset size, step and strain smoothing kernel) whereas global algorithms are influenced by the applied mesh to a large extent. In this contribution, the aim is to present a methodology to objectively compare both approaches in terms of resolution and spatial resolution. Finally, a comparison will be made to a novel adaptive global DIC approach that is less dependent on the initial user input. Introduction Digital Image Correlation (DIC) is gradually becoming a standard tool in experimental mechanics, for both industry and academia. Results of the measurement technique, however, are mostly used qualitatively (detect hotspots, check boundary conditions, visualize some deformation phenomena), but there are still only very few examples of quantitative use of such measurements (to validate models or identify constitutive behaviour etc.) This is due to the fact that current implementations of DIC are highly dependent on the initial user input. Indeed, a subdivision of DIC algorithms is usually made in terms of local [1] and global [2] DIC. Local DIC, or subset-based DIC, heavily relies on the adopted subset, step and eventual strain smoothing kernel [3,4]. Global DIC, on the other hand, is highly influenced by the mesh density. Generally, for both methods a trade-off between resolution (noise-floor) and spatial resolution must be made. Indeed, as indicated in Fig. 1, a higher subset size , e.g. will largely decrease the noise-floor of a strain measurement since more smoothing is adopted, at the expect however of a decreased spatial resolution. The example shown is the result of an uni-axial tensile test on a 5-harness satin weave carbon/PPS thermoplastic composite where specific stress concentrations occur at the cross-over points (where warp and weft yarns are interlacing) [5]. Equivalently, larger element sizes will have an equivalent effect. It is, however, not clear yet how both methodologies can be mutually compared in terms of resolution vs. spatial resolution performance. Simply considering the same element and subset dimensions is much too drastic since the nodal values of the element are interconnected by its neighbouring elements. Fig. 1: Impact of subset size on strain noise floor and spatial resolution. In this contribution a more honest comparison will be performed based on the reconstruction of a sinusoidal wave at various frequencies. A comparison will be made to a novel adaptive global DIC approach [6]. It is important to stress that the algorithmic comparison is pure, since all the compared methodologies are implemented on the same platform, relying on identical interpolators and image processing. Only the correlation part differs. The purpose of this presentation is to make people aware that DIC data must be treated with care and additionally to invoke a discussion on global and local DIC methodologies. Results are still preliminary and accordingly cannot yet be published in this abstract.

Practical Uncertainty Quantification Guidelines for DIC-Based Numerical Model Validation

Uncertainty Quantification for DIC Displacement Measurements in Industrial Environments

Uncertainty Quantification for 3D Digital Image Correlation Displacement Measurements Using Monte Carlo Method

Random Errors in DIC Caused by Non-Uniform Image Noise

A Study of the Influence of Calibration Uncertainty on the Global Uncertainty for Digital Image Correlation Using a Monte Carlo Approach

Validation of finite‐element models using full‐field experimental data: Levelling finite‐element analysis data through a digital image correlation engine

Comparison of subset-based local and FE-based global digital image correlation: Theoretical error analysis and validation

Quantification of resolution and spatial resolution in local and global DIC

On errors of digital image correlation due to speckle patterns

Spatial DIC Errors due to Pattern-Induced Bias and Grey Level Discretization

DIC Challenge 2.0: Developing Images and Guidelines for Evaluating Accuracy and Resolution of 2D Analyses

Experimental Analysis of Image Noise and Interpolation Bias in Digital Image Correlation

Quasi-Gauss Point Digital Image/Volume Correlation: a Simple Approach for Reducing Systematic Errors Due to Undermatched Shape Functions

Some Practical Considerations in Finite Element-Based Digital Image Correlation

Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns.

Theoretical estimation of systematic errors in local deformation measurements using digital image correlation

Algorithm Analysis and Optimization of a Digital Image Correlation Method Using a Non-Probability Interval Multidimensional Parallelepiped Model

Optimizing Metrological Efficiency: Comparative Analysis of Filtering Methods for 2D DIC

Impact of Speckle Deformability on Digital Imaging Correlation

Universal Method Using a Pre-Deformed Reference Subset to Eliminate the Interpolation Bias in Digital Image Correlation