The taxonomy of symptoms on the axis of psychosomatic totality—Results of a qualitative study in 20 patients.

Lutz Goetzmann,Laura K. Briese,Karin Becker,Konstantin Hesse,Barbara Ruettner,Adrian M. Siegel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000487
2024-02-01
Psychoanalytic Psychology
Abstract:Psychosomatic symptoms are common and result in high health care costs. An etiological understanding is of importance for psychotherapy. In the present study, a psychosomatic model (the “axis of psychosomatic totality”) developed from clinical experience and previous literature was empirically examined. Twenty patients with psychosomatic symptoms were included in the study. To obtain the greatest possible stratification, all diagnosis groups between the ages of 18 and 65 years eligible for treatment in a psychosomatic clinic were included, for example, primarily mood disorders and neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders. A semistructured interview was conducted, audio-documented, and transcribed. A codebook was created based on the first codings. Data from the interviews were analyzed using grounded theory methods. The codes showed good interrater reliability. Statements about bodily symptoms could be assigned to the symbolic pole, asymbolic poles I and II, the imaginary zone, and the logic pole of the axis of psychosomatic totality. Most symptoms could be assigned to the imaginary zone, which reflects the unconscious imaginary body image (n = 157). Symbolic symptoms arising against the background of unconscious conflicts were also frequently mentioned (n = 99), while symptoms on the asymbolic poles I and II were reported less frequently (n = 37, n = 18). In particular, the transitions from the imaginary zone to the adjacent poles were fluid. The dimensions of the axis of psychosomatic totality were directly reflected in the bodily symptoms reported in the interviews. A questionnaire suitable for use in larger psychosomatic samples should now be developed based on patients’ statements. 心身症状很常见,并会导致高昂的医疗费用。病因学理解对于心理治疗很重要。在本研究中,对于自临床经验和先前文献发展出来的心身模型(心身整体轴)进行了实证检查。方法:本研究纳入了20例有心身症状的患者。为了获得尽可能大的分层,年龄在18至65岁之间有资格在心身诊所接受治疗的所有诊断组都被纳入其中,主要是情绪障碍和神经症,压力相关和躯体形式障碍。对他们进行了半结构化访谈,进行了录音和转录。基于最初编码创建了密码本。访谈数据使用扎根理论方法进行了分析。这些代码显示出良好的评判间信度。结果:关于身体症状的陈述可以分配个心身整体轴的象征极,非象征极点I和II,想象区和心身整体轴的逻辑极。大多数症状可归因于想象区,它反映了无意识的想象身体形象(n = 157)。在无意识冲突背景下出现的象征性症状也经常被提及(n = 99), 而非象征极点I和II的症状则较少被报道(n = 37, n = 18)。特别是,从想象区到相邻极点的过渡是流动的。结论:心身整体轴的维度直接反映在访谈中报告的身体症状中。现在应该基于患者的陈述制定适用于更大的心身样本的问卷
psychology, clinical, psychoanalysis
What problem does this paper attempt to address?