Polygenic risk scores for nicotine use and family history of smoking are associated with smoking behaviour

Jerome C. Foo,Maja P. Völker,Fabian Streit,Josef Frank,Norman Zacharias,Lea Zillich,Lea Sirignano,Peter Nürnberg,Thomas F. Wienker,Michael Wagner,Markus M Nöthen,Michael Nothnagel,Henrik Walter,Bernd Lenz,Rainer Spanagel,Falk Kiefer,Georg Winterer,Marcella Rietschel,Stephanie H. Witt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112415
IF: 4.852
2024-08-18
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Abstract:Introduction Formal genetics studies show that smoking is influenced by genetic factors; exploring this on the molecular level can offer deeper insight into the etiology of smoking behaviours. Methods Summary statistics from the latest wave of the GWAS and Sequencing Consortium of Alcohol and Nicotine (GSCAN) were used to calculate polygenic risk scores (PRS) in a sample of ~2,200 smokers/never-smokers. The associations of smoking status with PRS for Smoking Initiation (i.e., Lifetime Smoking; SI-PRS), and Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) score with PRS for Cigarettes per Day (CpD-PRS) were examined, as were distinct/additive effects of parental smoking on smoking status. Results SI-PRS explained 10.56 % of variance (Nagelkerke-R 2 ) in smoking status (p= 6.45 x10 -30 ). In smokers, CpD-PRS w as associated with FTND score (R 2 = 5.03 %, p=1. 88 x10 –12 ). Parental smoking alone explained R 2 =3.06% (p=2.43×10 -12 ) of smoking status, and 0.96 % when added to the most informative SI-PRS model (total R2= 11.52 %). Conclusion These results show the potential utility of molecular genetic data for research investigating smoking prevention. The fact that PRS explains more variance than family history highlights progress from formal to molecular genetics; the partial overlap and increased predictive value when using both suggests the importance of combining these approaches.
psychiatry,substance abuse
What problem does this paper attempt to address?