Association of global longitudinal strain by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with adverse outcomes among community‐dwelling adults without cardiovascular disease: The Dallas Heart Study

Vinayak Subramanian,Neil Keshvani,Matthew W. Segar,Nitin J. Kondamudi,Alvin Chandra,Bhumika Maddineni,Susan A. Matulevicius,Erin D. Michos,Joao A.C. Lima,Jarett D. Berry,Ambarish Pandey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3158
2024-02-14
European Journal of Heart Failure
Abstract:Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessed via feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). LV GLS is associated with MACE in adults without prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD). Among participants without pre‐existing CVD, a higher burden of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was associated with impairment of LV GLS. CI, confidence interval; EDMi, end‐diastolic mass index; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction. Aim Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) may detect subtle abnormalities in myocardial contractility among individuals with normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF). However, the prognostic implications of GLS among healthy, community‐dwelling adults is not well‐established. Methods and results Overall, 2234 community‐dwelling adults (56% women, 47% Black) with LVEF ≥50% without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) from the Dallas Heart Study who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with GLS assessed by feature tracking CMR (FT‐CMR) were included. The association of GLS with the risk of incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of incident myocardial infarction, incident heart failure [HF], hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, coronary revascularization, and all‐cause death), and incident HF or death were assessed with adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 309 participants (13.8%) had MACE during a median follow‐up duration of 17 years. Participants with the worst GLS (Q4) were more likely male and of the Black race with a history of tobacco use and diabetes with lower LVEF, higher LV end‐diastolic volume, and higher LV mass index. Cumulative incidence of MACE was higher among participants with worse (Q4 vs. Q1) GLS (20.4% vs. 9.0%). In multivariable‐adjusted Cox models that included clinical characteristics, cardiac biomarkers and baseline LVEF, worse GLS (Q4 vs. Q1) was associated with a significantly higher risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–2.24, p = 0.02) and incident HF or death (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03–2.38, p = 0.04). Conclusions Impaired LV GLS assessed by FT‐CMR among adults free of cardiovascular disease is associated with a higher risk of incident MACE and incident HF or death independent of cardiovascular risk factors, cardiac biomarkers and LVEF.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?