Experimental Constraints on Metal Percolation Through Silicate : Implications for Core Formation on Asteroids and Planetesimals
M. S. Duncan,Y. Fei
2017-01-01
Abstract:Introduction: Core formation is a seemingly ubiquitous process in the early solar system, yet the mechanics of metal segregation on smaller planetary bodies is debatable. Small bodies, e.g., early-formed planetesimals, asteroids, planetary embryos etc., were potentially too cold for complete silicate melting, i.e., no magma ocean, yet core formation occurred on ~5 Myr timescales [1]. This invokes scenarios of efficient core formation by percolation of metallic melt through a solid silicate matrix, a difficult process as the wetting ability of Fe melt is negligible due to its high dihedral angle (Θ>90°) [2-5]. In order to enhance the percolative ability of the metallic melt, several modifications to the scenario have been proposed. The simplest adjustment increases the volume of metallic melt present to >5-10 vol.% [5-7] at which point density driven flow, similar to Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities, would cause the metallic phase to cross the percolation threshold. This is likely in the earliest stages of planetary differentiation, but as differentiation proceeds, or if the body is metal-poor, this density-driven process will not operate. Another well-studied scenario is the addition of light elements (S [3,4,8-15], S-O [5,13-18], Si [19,20]) to the metallic phase that reduced the dihedral angle of the metallic phase to <60° allowing it to wet grain boundaries and percolate to the core. At the lower pressures (<~10 GPa) of core formation on small planetary bodies, the addition of O and S causes the strongest reduction in Θ to ≤60° allowing it to wet, while the addition of S only has a less significant effect (Θ>60°), and the addition of Si has little to no effect. The effect of C has not been studied, nor has the combined effect of several light elements, e.g. S+C+O. A third, less studied scenario includes the presence of a silicate melt in addition to the metallic melt [e.g., 21]. As silicate melts have much lower Θ values (<45°), they wet grain boundaries very well. Studies done with Fe-S metallic phase [9,10] did not find any enhancement of metallic melt wetting in the presence of silicate melt. However, at high enough melt fractions, the metallic melt will form discrete droplets inside silicate melt channels that may allow for densitydriven separation, though this scenario is likely more complex [21]. Methods: Two sets of piston cylinder experiments were conducted to determine the 1) dihedral angle of C-bearing metallic melts and 2) percolation experiments to determine the silicate melt fraction at which separation of metallic phase occurs. All experiments contained a San Carlos olivine-pyroxene mix acting as the silicate matrix for the metallic phase, were placed in fired MgO containers, and held at the P and T of interest for 6 hrs, after a sintering step at 800 °C for 4 hrs. Pressure was varied between 1.0 and 3.0 GPa at 1400 °C and temperature ranged from 1400-1600 °C at 3.0 GPa. Dihedral angle experiments consisted of ~5 vol.% Fe-C mix, with either ~2 or 4.3 wt.% C, i.e., on the Fe-rich side of the Fe3C eutectic and at the eutectic. Percolation experiments consisted of layers of metalfree silicate and metal-bearing silicate, where the metallic phase was Fe-C or Fe-C-S. The compositions and texture of the quenched metallic liquid and silicate matrix and melt were analyzed with the electron microprobe and SEM. The dihedral angles were determined using the traditional method of measurement from a 2-D image slice (apparent angles) and using a 3-D imaging technique (FIB/SEM) [22]. Results: The dihedral angle experiments showed that carbon has little to no effect on the dihedral angle of the metallic melt in textural equilibrium with the silicate. Measured apparent angles in the Fe-C experiments conducted at 1400 °C range from ~110 to 122° as pressure decreases from 3.0 to 1.0 GPa (Fig. 1). At higher temperatures at 3.0 GPa, as the silicate melt fraction increased (~2 to 15% from 1400 to 1600 °C), the metal droplets were completely enclosed in silicate melt pockets (with apparent Θ ~26°, Figs. 1 and 2), precluding angle measurements of the metallic phase.